6 citations · 8 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: what can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness?
Dimity Stephen, Alexander Schniedermann, Andrey Lovakov +7
The recent surge in bibliometric studies published has been accompanied by increasing diversity in the completeness of reporting these studies' details, affecting reliability, repr…
On the performativity of SDG classifications in large bibliometric databases
Matteo Ottaviani, Stephan Stahlschmidt
Large bibliometric databases, such as Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex, facilitate bibliometric analyses, but are performative, affecting the visibility of scientific outputs a…
From indexation policies through citation networks to normalized citation impacts: Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions as varying resonance chambers
Stephan Stahlschmidt, Dimity Stephen
Dimensions was introduced as an alternative bibliometric database to the well-established Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus, however all three databases have fundamental differences…
Merits and Limits: Applying open data to monitor open access publications in bibliometric databases
Aliakbar Akbaritabar, Stephan Stahlschmidt
Identifying and monitoring Open Access (OA) publications might seem a trivial task while practical efforts prove otherwise. Contradictory information arise often depending on metad…
The dynamically changing publication universe as a reference point in national impact evaluation: A counterfactual case study on the Chinese publication growth
Stephan Stahlschmidt, Sybille Hinze
National bibliometric performance is commonly measured via relative impact indicators which appraise absolute national values through a global environment. Consequenty the resultin…