activity
20182021
most citedOn Evaluating Adversarial Robustness

579 citations · 579 across the 1 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

stat.ML2021

Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarks

Curtis G. Northcutt, Anish Athalye, Jonas Mueller

We identify label errors in the test sets of 10 of the most commonly-used computer vision, natural language, and audio datasets, and subsequently study the potential for these labe…

cs.LG2019579 cited

On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness

Nicholas Carlini, Anish Athalye, Nicolas Papernot +6

Correctly evaluating defenses against adversarial examples has proven to be extremely difficult. Despite the significant amount of recent work attempting to design defenses that wi…

stat.ML2018

Evaluating and Understanding the Robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairing

Logan Engstrom, Andrew Ilyas, Anish Athalye

We evaluate the robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairing, a recently proposed defense against adversarial examples. We find that a network trained with Adversarial Logit Pairing ach…

cs.CV2018

On the Robustness of the CVPR 2018 White-Box Adversarial Example Defenses

Anish Athalye, Nicholas Carlini

Neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. In this note, we evaluate the two white-box defenses that appeared at CVPR 2018 and find they are ineffective: w…

cs.CV2018

Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Information

Andrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Anish Athalye +1

Current neural network-based classifiers are susceptible to adversarial examples even in the black-box setting, where the attacker only has query access to the model. In practice,…

cs.LG2018

Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examples

Anish Athalye, Nicholas Carlini, David Wagner

We identify obfuscated gradients, a kind of gradient masking, as a phenomenon that leads to a false sense of security in defenses against adversarial examples. While defenses that…