activity
20182026
most citedSelf-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback

221 citations · 496 across the 47 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

33 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

TurnWise: The Gap between Single- and Multi-turn Language Model Capabilities

Victoria Graf, Valentina Pyatkin, Nouha Dziri +2

Multi-turn conversations are a common and critical mode of language model interaction. However, current open training and evaluation data focus on single-turn settings, failing to…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond)

Liwei Jiang, Yuanjun Chai, Margaret Li +7

Language models (LMs) often struggle to generate diverse, human-like creative content, raising concerns about the long-term homogenization of human thought through repeated exposur…

cs.CL2025

A Good Plan is Hard to Find: Aligning Models with Preferences is Misaligned with What Helps Users

Nishant Balepur, Matthew Shu, Yoo Yeon Sung +5

To assist users in complex tasks, LLMs generate plans: step-by-step instructions towards a goal. While alignment methods aim to ensure LLM plans are helpful, they train (RLHF) or e…

cs.CL2025

OMEGA: Can LLMs Reason Outside the Box in Math? Evaluating Exploratory, Compositional, and Transformative Generalization

Yiyou Sun, Shawn Hu, Georgia Zhou +4

Recent large-scale language models (LLMs) with long Chain-of-Thought reasoning-such as DeepSeek-R1-have achieved impressive results on Olympiad-level mathematics benchmarks. Howeve…

cs.CL2025★ 2 cited

2 OLMo 2 Furious

Team OLMo, Pete Walsh, Luca Soldaini +40

We present OLMo 2, the next generation of our fully open language models. OLMo 2 includes a family of dense autoregressive language models at 7B, 13B and 32B scales with fully rele…

cs.CL2024★ 8 cited

Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training

Nathan Lambert, Jacob Morrison, Valentina Pyatkin +20

Language model post-training is applied to refine behaviors and unlock new skills across a wide range of recent language models, but open recipes for applying these techniques lag…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Towards Implicit Bias Detection and Mitigation in Multi-Agent LLM Interactions

Angana Borah, Rada Mihalcea

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they are increasingly being employed in numerous studies to simulate societies and execute diverse social tasks. However, LLMs a…

cs.CL2024

SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior

Jing-Jing Li, Valentina Pyatkin, Max Kleiman-Weiner +7

The ideal AI safety moderation system would be both structurally interpretable (so its decisions can be reliably explained) and steerable (to align to safety standards and reflect…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

AI as Humanity's Salieri: Quantifying Linguistic Creativity of Language Models via Systematic Attribution of Machine Text against Web Text

Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Skyler Hallinan +8

Creativity has long been considered one of the most difficult aspect of human intelligence for AI to mimic. However, the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, has rai…

cs.CL2024

PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignment

Louis Castricato, Nathan Lile, Rafael Rafailov +2

The rapid advancement of language models (LMs) necessitates robust alignment with diverse user values. However, current preference optimization approaches often fail to capture the…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models

Faeze Brahman, Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran +11

Chat-based language models are designed to be helpful, yet they should not comply with every user request. While most existing work primarily focuses on refusal of "unsafe" queries…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Rel-A.I.: An Interaction-Centered Approach To Measuring Human-LM Reliance

Kaitlyn Zhou, Jena D. Hwang, Xiang Ren +3

The ability to communicate uncertainty, risk, and limitation is crucial for the safety of large language models. However, current evaluations of these abilities rely on simple cali…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models

Liwei Jiang, Kavel Rao, Seungju Han +8

We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs

Seungju Han, Kavel Rao, Allyson Ettinger +5

We introduce WildGuard -- an open, light-weight moderation tool for LLM safety that achieves three goals: (1) identifying malicious intent in user prompts, (2) detecting safety ris…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild

Bill Yuchen Lin, Yuntian Deng, Khyathi Chandu +6

We introduce WildBench, an automated evaluation framework designed to benchmark large language models (LLMs) using challenging, real-world user queries. WildBench consists of 1,024…

cs.CL2024

CULTURE-GEN: Revealing Global Cultural Perception in Language Models through Natural Language Prompting

Huihan Li, Liwei Jiang, Jena D. Hwang +7

As the utilization of large language models (LLMs) has proliferated world-wide, it is crucial for them to have adequate knowledge and fair representation for diverse global culture…

cs.CL2023★ 10 cited

The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning

Bill Yuchen Lin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Ximing Lu +5

The alignment tuning process of large language models (LLMs) typically involves instruction learning through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and preference tuning via reinforcement le…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

What Makes it Ok to Set a Fire? Iterative Self-distillation of Contexts and Rationales for Disambiguating Defeasible Social and Moral Situations

Kavel Rao, Liwei Jiang, Valentina Pyatkin +5

Moral or ethical judgments rely heavily on the specific contexts in which they occur. Understanding varying shades of defeasible contextualizations (i.e., additional information th…

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement

Linlu Qiu, Liwei Jiang, Ximing Lu +8

The ability to derive underlying principles from a handful of observations and then generalize to novel situations -- known as inductive reasoning -- is central to human intelligen…

cs.CL2023★ 31 cited

Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties

Taylor Sorensen, Liwei Jiang, Jena Hwang +10

Human values are crucial to human decision-making. Value pluralism is the view that multiple correct values may be held in tension with one another (e.g., when considering lying to…

cs.CL2023★ 35 cited

Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training

Zeqiu Wu, Yushi Hu, Weijia Shi +6

Language models (LMs) often exhibit undesirable text generation behaviors, including generating false, toxic, or irrelevant outputs. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLH…

cs.CL2023★ 71 cited

Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality

Nouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar +13

Transformer large language models (LLMs) have sparked admiration for their exceptional performance on tasks that demand intricate multi-step reasoning. Yet, these models simultaneo…

cs.CL2023

Inference-Time Policy Adapters (IPA): Tailoring Extreme-Scale LMs without Fine-tuning

Ximing Lu, Faeze Brahman, Peter West +14

While extreme-scale language models have demonstrated exceptional performance on a variety of language tasks, the degree of control over these language models through pure promptin…

cs.CL2023★ 5 cited

Evaluating Open-Domain Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models

Ehsan Kamalloo, Nouha Dziri, Charles L. A. Clarke +1

Lexical matching remains the de facto evaluation method for open-domain question answering (QA). Unfortunately, lexical matching fails completely when a plausible candidate answer…