activity
20172026
most citedFA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm

485 citations · 628 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.SI2026

From Network Inequality to Network Fairness: A Perspective on Responsible Decision-Making

Lisette Espín-Noboa, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Pak-Hang Wong +5

Social networks shape how individuals make decisions and how opportunities are distributed. However, the mechanisms that generate these networks often reflect pre-existing inequali…

cs.SI2023★ 23 cited

Social network modeling and applications, a tutorial

Lisette Espín-Noboa, Tiago Peixoto, Fariba Karimi

Social networks have been widely studied over the last century from multiple disciplines to understand societal issues such as inequality in employment rates, managerial performanc…

cs.CY2022★ 1 cited

Beyond Incompatibility: Trade-offs between Mutually Exclusive Fairness Criteria in Machine Learning and Law

Meike Zehlike, Alex Loosley, Håkan Jonsson +2

Fair and trustworthy AI is becoming ever more important in both machine learning and legal domains. One important consequence is that decision makers must seek to guarantee a 'fair…

cs.IR2022★ 2 cited

Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directions

Gourab K Patro, Lorenzo Porcaro, Laura Mitchell +3

Ranking, recommendation, and retrieval systems are widely used in online platforms and other societal systems, including e-commerce, media-streaming, admissions, gig platforms, and…

cs.IR2021★ 92 cited

Fairness in Ranking: A Survey

Meike Zehlike, Ke Yang, Julia Stoyanovich

In the past few years, there has been much work on incorporating fairness requirements into algorithmic rankers, with contributions coming from the data management, algorithms, inf…

cs.IR2020★ 1 cited

A Note on the Significance Adjustment for FA*IR with Two Protected Groups

Meike Zehlike, Tom Sühr, Carlos Castillo

In this report we provide an improvement of the significance adjustment from the FA*IR algorithm of Zehlike et al., which did not work for very short rankings in combination with a…

cs.CY2020

Towards a Flexible Framework for Algorithmic Fairness

Philip Hacker, Emil Wiedemann, Meike Zehlike

Increasingly, scholars seek to integrate legal and technological insights to combat bias in AI systems. In recent years, many different definitions for ensuring non-discrimination…

cs.IR2019★ 12 cited

FairSearch: A Tool For Fairness in Ranked Search Results

Meike Zehlike, Tom Sühr, Carlos Castillo +1

Ranked search results and recommendations have become the main mechanism by which we find content, products, places, and people online. With hiring, selecting, purchasing, and dati…

cs.IR2018★ 12 cited

Reducing Disparate Exposure in Ranking: A Learning To Rank Approach

Meike Zehlike, Carlos Castillo

Ranked search results have become the main mechanism by which we find content, products, places, and people online. Thus their ordering contributes not only to the satisfaction of…

cs.CY2017★ 485 cited

FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm

Meike Zehlike, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo +3

In this work, we define and solve the Fair Top-k Ranking problem, in which we want to determine a subset of k candidates from a large pool of n >> k candidates, maximizing utility…