activity
20182026
most citedA Swiss Army Infinitesimal Jackknife

25 citations · 45 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

stat.ME2026

Do covariates explain why these groups differ? The choice of reference group can reverse conclusions in the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition

Manuel Quintero, Advik Shreekumar, William T. Stephenson +1

Scientists often want to explain why an outcome is different in two groups. For instance, differences in patient mortality rates across two hospitals could be due to differences in…

stat.ME2025

Common Functional Decompositions Can Mis-attribute Differences in Outcomes Between Populations

Manuel Quintero, William T. Stephenson, Advik Shreekumar +1

In science and social science, we often wish to explain why an outcome is different in two populations. For instance, if a jobs program benefits members of one city more than anoth…

stat.ML2021★ 3 cited

Can we globally optimize cross-validation loss? Quasiconvexity in ridge regression

William T. Stephenson, Zachary Frangella, Madeleine Udell +1

Models like LASSO and ridge regression are extensively used in practice due to their interpretability, ease of use, and strong theoretical guarantees. Cross-validation (CV) is wide…

stat.ML2021★ 1 cited

Measuring the robustness of Gaussian processes to kernel choice

William T. Stephenson, Soumya Ghosh, Tin D. Nguyen +3

Gaussian processes (GPs) are used to make medical and scientific decisions, including in cardiac care and monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Notably, the choice of GP…

stat.ML2020

Approximate Cross-Validation with Low-Rank Data in High Dimensions

William T. Stephenson, Madeleine Udell, Tamara Broderick

Many recent advances in machine learning are driven by a challenging trifecta: large data size ; high dimensions; and expensive algorithms. In this setting, cross-validation (CV…

stat.ML2020★ 3 cited

Approximate Cross-Validation for Structured Models

Soumya Ghosh, William T. Stephenson, Tin D. Nguyen +2

Many modern data analyses benefit from explicitly modeling dependence structure in data -- such as measurements across time or space, ordered words in a sentence, or genes in a gen…

stat.ML2019★ 10 cited

Approximate Cross-Validation in High Dimensions with Guarantees

William T. Stephenson, Tamara Broderick

Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) can be particularly accurate among cross-validation (CV) variants for machine learning assessment tasks -- e.g., assessing methods' error or…

q-bio.QM2018★ 3 cited

Reconstructing probabilistic trees of cellular differentiation from single-cell RNA-seq data

Miriam Shiffman, William T. Stephenson, Geoffrey Schiebinger +4

Until recently, transcriptomics was limited to bulk RNA sequencing, obscuring the underlying expression patterns of individual cells in favor of a global average. Thanks to technol…

stat.ME2018★ 25 cited

A Swiss Army Infinitesimal Jackknife

Ryan Giordano, Will Stephenson, Runjing Liu +2

The error or variability of machine learning algorithms is often assessed by repeatedly re-fitting a model with different weighted versions of the observed data. The ubiquitous too…