activity
20192026
most citedGemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size

145 citations · 187 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.CL2026

CT: Counterfactual Causal Reasoning for Sentiment Shifts in Social-Media Conversation Trees

S M Rafiuddin, Atriya Sen

Sentiment in social-media threads does not only vary across posts; it shifts as users react to claims, corrections, evidence, and hostility within a branching reply tree. We study…

cs.CL2024

Seed-Free Synthetic Data Generation Framework for Instruction-Tuning LLMs: A Case Study in Thai

Parinthapat Pengpun, Can Udomcharoenchaikit, Weerayut Buaphet +1

We present a synthetic data approach for instruction-tuning large language models (LLMs) for low-resource languages in a data-efficient manner, specifically focusing on Thai. We id…

cs.CL2024★ 145 cited

Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size

Gemma Team, Morgane Riviere, Shreya Pathak +195

In this work, we introduce Gemma 2, a new addition to the Gemma family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models, ranging in scale from 2 billion to 27 billion parameters. In th…

cs.CV2024★ 4 cited

Imagen 3

Imagen-Team-Google, :, Jason Baldridge +257

We introduce Imagen 3, a latent diffusion model that generates high quality images from text prompts. We describe our quality and responsibility evaluations. Imagen 3 is preferred…

cs.CY2024★ 9 cited

A Mechanism-Based Approach to Mitigating Harms from Persuasive Generative AI

Seliem El-Sayed, Canfer Akbulut, Amanda McCroskery +17

Recent generative AI systems have demonstrated more advanced persuasive capabilities and are increasingly permeating areas of life where they can influence decision-making. Generat…

cs.LG2024★ 11 cited

Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities

Mary Phuong, Matthew Aitchison, Elliot Catt +24

To understand the risks posed by a new AI system, we must understand what it can and cannot do. Building on prior work, we introduce a programme of new "dangerous capability" evalu…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computations

Thomas McGrath, Matthew Rahtz, Janos Kramar +2

We investigate the internal structure of language model computations using causal analysis and demonstrate two motifs: (1) a form of adaptive computation where ablations of one att…

cs.LG2023★ 6 cited

Does Circuit Analysis Interpretability Scale? Evidence from Multiple Choice Capabilities in Chinchilla

Tom Lieberum, Matthew Rahtz, János Kramár +4

\emph{Circuit analysis} is a promising technique for understanding the internal mechanisms of language models. However, existing analyses are done in small models far from the stat…

cs.LG2023★ 6 cited

Tracr: Compiled Transformers as a Laboratory for Interpretability

David Lindner, János Kramár, Sebastian Farquhar +3

We show how to "compile" human-readable programs into standard decoder-only transformer models. Our compiler, Tracr, generates models with known structure. This structure can be us…

cs.LG2022★ 2 cited

Safe Deep RL in 3D Environments using Human Feedback

Matthew Rahtz, Vikrant Varma, Ramana Kumar +3

Agents should avoid unsafe behaviour during both training and deployment. This typically requires a simulator and a procedural specification of unsafe behaviour. Unfortunately, a s…

cs.LG2019★ 1 cited

An Extensible Interactive Interface for Agent Design

Matthew Rahtz, James Fang, Anca D. Dragan +1

In artificial intelligence, we often specify tasks through a reward function. While this works well in some settings, many tasks are hard to specify this way. In deep reinforcement…