activity
20192022
most citedArgument Mining Driven Analysis of Peer-Reviews

6 citations · 9 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.CL20223 cited

Towards a Holistic View on Argument Quality Prediction

Michael Fromm, Max Berrendorf, Johanna Reiml +4

Argumentation is one of society's foundational pillars, and, sparked by advances in NLP and the vast availability of text data, automated mining of arguments receives increasing at…

cs.LG2021

Active Learning for Argument Strength Estimation

Nataliia Kees, Michael Fromm, Evgeniy Faerman +1

High-quality arguments are an essential part of decision-making. Automatically predicting the quality of an argument is a complex task that recently got much attention in argument…

cs.LG2021

Adaptive Multi-Resolution Attention with Linear Complexity

Yao Zhang, Yunpu Ma, Thomas Seidl +1

Transformers have improved the state-of-the-art across numerous tasks in sequence modeling. Besides the quadratic computational and memory complexity w.r.t the sequence length, the…

cs.LG2021

NF-GNN: Network Flow Graph Neural Networks for Malware Detection and Classification

Julian Busch, Anton Kocheturov, Volker Tresp +1

Malicious software (malware) poses an increasing threat to the security of communication systems as the number of interconnected mobile devices increases exponentially. While some…

cs.CY20206 cited

Argument Mining Driven Analysis of Peer-Reviews

Michael Fromm, Evgeniy Faerman, Max Berrendorf +7

Peer reviewing is a central process in modern research and essential for ensuring high quality and reliability of published work. At the same time, it is a time-consuming process a…

cs.IR2020

Diversity Aware Relevance Learning for Argument Search

Michael Fromm, Max Berrendorf, Sandra Obermeier +2

In this work, we focus on the problem of retrieving relevant arguments for a query claim covering diverse aspects. State-of-the-art methods rely on explicit mappings between claims…