28 citations · 30 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for
16 papers
Position: We Need Practical AI Alignment Methods to Mirror Human Reasoning
Vijay Keswani, Breanna K. Nguyen, Cyrus Cousins +3
AI systems are increasingly employed as decision aids, decision delegates, or autonomous decision-makers. This position paper argues that in many settings, particularly high-stakes…
Moral Change or Noise? On Problems of Aligning AI With Temporally Unstable Human Feedback
Vijay Keswani, Cyrus Cousins, Breanna Nguyen +4
Alignment methods in moral domains seek to elicit moral preferences of human stakeholders and incorporate them into AI. This presupposes moral preferences as static targets, but su…
Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignment
Cyrus Cousins, Vijay Keswani, Vincent Conitzer +3
Recent AI trends seek to align AI models to learned human-centric objectives, such as personal preferences, utility, or societal values. Using standard preference elicitation metho…
Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisions
Vijay Keswani, Vincent Conitzer, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong +3
A growing body of work in Ethical AI attempts to capture human moral judgments through simple computational models. The key question we address in this work is whether such simple…
On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methods
Kyle Boerstler, Vijay Keswani, Lok Chan +4
Preference elicitation frameworks feature heavily in the research on participatory ethical AI tools and provide a viable mechanism to enquire and incorporate the moral values of va…
On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitation
Vijay Keswani, Vincent Conitzer, Hoda Heidari +2
Computational preference elicitation methods are tools used to learn people's preferences quantitatively in a given context. Recent works on preference elicitation advocate for act…