40 citations · 55 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
eRevise+RF: A Writing Evaluation System for Assessing Student Essay Revisions and Providing Formative Feedback
Zhexiong Liu, Diane Litman, Elaine Wang +4
The ability to revise essays in response to feedback is important for students' writing success. An automated writing evaluation (AWE) system that supports students in revising the…
Analyzing Large Language Models for Classroom Discussion Assessment
Nhat Tran, Benjamin Pierce, Diane Litman +2
Automatically assessing classroom discussion quality is becoming increasingly feasible with the help of new NLP advancements such as large language models (LLMs). In this work, we…
Utilizing Natural Language Processing for Automated Assessment of Classroom Discussion
Nhat Tran, Benjamin Pierce, Diane Litman +2
Rigorous and interactive class discussions that support students to engage in high-level thinking and reasoning are essential to learning and are a central component of most teachi…
Predicting the Quality of Revisions in Argumentative Writing
Zhexiong Liu, Diane Litman, Elaine Wang +2
The ability to revise in response to feedback is critical to students' writing success. In the case of argument writing in specific, identifying whether an argument revision (AR) i…
Annotation and Classification of Evidence and Reasoning Revisions in Argumentative Writing
Tazin Afrin, Elaine Wang, Diane Litman +2
Automated writing evaluation systems can improve students' writing insofar as students attend to the feedback provided and revise their essay drafts in ways aligned with such feedb…
eRevise: Using Natural Language Processing to Provide Formative Feedback on Text Evidence Usage in Student Writing
Haoran Zhang, Ahmed Magooda, Diane Litman +5
Writing a good essay typically involves students revising an initial paper draft after receiving feedback. We present eRevise, a web-based writing and revising environment that use…