activity
20192026
most citedMeasuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding

290 citations · 1.5k across the 25 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

26 papers

cs.AI2026

Demonstrating Generalization Failures via Mixtures of Conditional Policies

Jou Barzdukas, Jack Peck, Julian Schulz +3

Post-training of frontier language models is conducted on curated task suites, and inevitably leaves a distribution shift between training and deployment environments. This exposes…

cs.CY2026

Open Technical Problems in Open-Weight AI Model Risk Management

Stephen Casper, Kyle O'Brien, Shayne Longpre +19

Frontier AI models with openly available weights are steadily becoming more powerful and widely adopted. However, compared to proprietary models, open-weight models pose different…

cs.CL2026

CLExEval: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Qualitative Evaluation of LLM Clinical Reasoning

Ajmal M., Abin Roy, Afthab Salam Kanniyan +4

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong results on many medical benchmarks, but their clinical reasoning remains difficult to evaluate reliably. A central risk is an evaluation…

cs.CL2026

TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models

Jinho Choo, JunSeung Lee, Jimyeong Kim +3

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong multilingual capabilities, yet often fail to consistently generate responses in the intended language, exhibiting a phenomenon known…

cs.LG2025

Depth-Wise Activation Steering for Honest Language Models

Gracjan Góral, Marysia Winkels, Steven Basart

Large language models sometimes assert falsehoods despite internally representing the correct answer, failures of honesty rather than accuracy, which undermines auditability and sa…

cs.LG2025

Measuring Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Faithfulness and Verbosity

Austin Meek, Eitan Sprejer, Iván Arcuschin +2

Chain-of-thought (CoT) outputs let us read a model's step-by-step reasoning. Since any long, serial reasoning process must pass through this textual trace, the quality of the CoT i…

cs.LG2025★ 3 cited

Remote Labor Index: Measuring AI Automation of Remote Work

Mantas Mazeika, Alice Gatti, Cristina Menghini +44

AIs have made rapid progress on research-oriented benchmarks of knowledge and reasoning, but it remains unclear how these gains translate into economic value and automation. To mea…

cs.AI2025

Psychometric Personality Shaping Modulates Capabilities and Safety in Language Models

Stephen Fitz, Peter Romero, Steven Basart +2

Large Language Models increasingly mediate high-stakes interactions, intensifying research on their capabilities and safety. While recent work has shown that LLMs exhibit consisten…

cs.LG2025

Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Answer the Wrong Questions

Yucen Lily Li, Daohan Lu, Polina Kirichenko +4

To detect distribution shifts and improve model safety, many out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods rely on the predictive uncertainty or features of supervised models trained…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress?

Richard Ren, Steven Basart, Adam Khoja +9

As artificial intelligence systems grow more powerful, there has been increasing interest in "AI safety" research to address emerging and future risks. However, the field of AI saf…

cs.LG2024★ 13 cited

The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning

Nathaniel Li, Alexander Pan, Anjali Gopal +54

The White House Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence highlights the risks of large language models (LLMs) empowering malicious actors in developing biological, cyber, and che…

cs.LG2024★ 23 cited

HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal

Mantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin +9

Automated red teaming holds substantial promise for uncovering and mitigating the risks associated with the malicious use of large language models (LLMs), yet the field lacks a sta…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboards

Norah Alzahrani, Hisham Abdullah Alyahya, Yazeed Alnumay +9

Large Language Model (LLM) leaderboards based on benchmark rankings are regularly used to guide practitioners in model selection. Often, the published leaderboard rankings are take…

cs.LG2023★ 65 cited

Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency

Andy Zou, Long Phan, Sarah Chen +18

In this paper, we identify and characterize the emerging area of representation engineering (RepE), an approach to enhancing the transparency of AI systems that draws on insights f…

cs.LG2023★ 28 cited

Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmark

Alexander Pan, Jun Shern Chan, Andy Zou +7

Artificial agents have traditionally been trained to maximize reward, which may incentivize power-seeking and deception, analogous to how next-token prediction in language models (…

cs.CV2022★ 2 cited

How Would The Viewer Feel? Estimating Wellbeing From Video Scenarios

Mantas Mazeika, Eric Tang, Andy Zou +6

In recent years, deep neural networks have demonstrated increasingly strong abilities to recognize objects and activities in videos. However, as video understanding becomes widely…

cs.CV2021

Towards Robustness of Neural Networks

Steven Basart

We introduce several new datasets namely ImageNet-A/O and ImageNet-R as well as a synthetic environment and testing suite we called CAOS. ImageNet-A/O allow researchers to focus in…

cs.SE2021★ 144 cited

Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS

Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Saurav Kadavath +8

While programming is one of the most broadly applicable skills in modern society, modern machine learning models still cannot code solutions to basic problems. Despite its importan…

cs.LG2021★ 280 cited

Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset

Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath +5

Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, w…

cs.CY2020★ 290 cited

Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding

Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart +4

We propose a new test to measure a text model's multitask accuracy. The test covers 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and more. To attai…

cs.CY2020★ 100 cited

Aligning AI With Shared Human Values

Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart +4

We show how to assess a language model's knowledge of basic concepts of morality. We introduce the ETHICS dataset, a new benchmark that spans concepts in justice, well-being, dutie…

cs.CV2020★ 19 cited

The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalization

Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu +10

We introduce four new real-world distribution shift datasets consisting of changes in image style, image blurriness, geographic location, camera operation, and more. With our new d…

cs.CV2019★ 179 cited

Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settings

Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Mantas Mazeika +5

Detecting out-of-distribution examples is important for safety-critical machine learning applications such as detecting novel biological phenomena and self-driving cars. However, e…

cs.CV2019★ 51 cited

DIODE: A Dense Indoor and Outdoor DEpth Dataset

Igor Vasiljevic, Nick Kolkin, Shanyi Zhang +8

We introduce DIODE, a dataset that contains thousands of diverse high resolution color images with accurate, dense, long-range depth measurements. DIODE (Dense Indoor/Outdoor DEpth…