activity
20172026
most citedDark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

1.2k citations · 3.5k across the 22 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing astro-ph.COShow all

21 papers · 1 filter

astro-ph.CO2026

Brightest Cluster Galaxy ellipticity as proxy for halo shape: Orientation bias, assembly bias, and potential selection effects in SZ-selected clusters

Radhakrishnan Srinivasan, Tae-hyeon Shin, Anja von der Linden +93

The orientation of triaxial galaxy clusters with respect to the line-of-sight is expected to be one of the prime sources of scatter and potential bias in optical observables (e.g.,…

astro-ph.CO2026

Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Adamow +169

We present cosmology results combining galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing measured in the full six years (Y6) of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) covering…

astro-ph.CO2026

Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework

D. Sanchez-Cid, A. Ferté, J. Blazek +115

We present the methodology for the weak lensing and galaxy clustering analyses of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 6 data set. In this work, we design and validate the analysis pi…

astro-ph.CO2026

Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Magnification modeling and its impact on galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology

E. Legnani, J. Elvin-Poole, D. Anbajagane +72

Gravitational lensing magnification alters the observed spatial distribution of galaxies and must be accounted for to prevent biases in cosmological probes of the large-scale struc…

astro-ph.CO2025

Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of the ACT DR5 Galaxy Clusters with the DES Year 3 Weak Lensing Data

T. Shin, E. J. Baxter, E. Lee +93

We use weak gravitational lensing measurements from Year 3 Dark Energy Survey data to calibrate the masses of 443 galaxy clusters selected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect from At…

astro-ph.CO2025★ 2 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Simulation-based CDM inference from weak lensing and galaxy clustering maps with deep learning: Analysis design

A. Thomsen, J. Bucko, T. Kacprzak +99

Data-driven approaches using deep learning are emerging as powerful techniques to extract non-Gaussian information from cosmological large-scale structure. This work presents the f…

astro-ph.CO2024

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps II. Cosmological results

M. Gatti, G. Campailla, N. Jeffrey +99

We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three yea…

astro-ph.CO2024

Weak lensing combined with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect: A study of baryonic feedback

L. Bigwood, A. Amon, A. Schneider +122

Extracting precise cosmology from weak lensing surveys requires modelling the non-linear matter power spectrum, which is suppressed at small scales due to baryonic feedback process…

astro-ph.CO2024★ 45 cited

The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey: Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Weak Gravitational Lensing by eRASS1 selected Galaxy Clusters

S. Grandis, V. Ghirardini, S. Bocquet +119

Number counts of galaxy clusters across redshift are a powerful cosmological probe, if a precise and accurate reconstruction of the underlying mass distribution is performed -- a c…

astro-ph.CO2023

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps I: validation on simulations

M. Gatti, N. Jeffrey, L. Whiteway +98

Beyond-two-point statistics contain additional information on cosmological as well as astrophysical and observational (systematics) parameters. In this methodology paper we provide…

astro-ph.CO2021★ 1.2k cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena +168

We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlatio…

astro-ph.CO2020★ 99 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit

O. Friedrich, F. Andrade-Oliveira, H. Camacho +109

We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansat…

astro-ph.CO2020★ 183 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogue

M. Gatti, E. Sheldon, A. Amon +100

We present and characterise the galaxy shape catalogue from the first 3 years of Dark Energy Survey (DES) observations, over an effective area of ~4143 deg of the southern sky.…

astro-ph.CO2020★ 83 cited

The Effect of Environment on Type Ia Supernovae in the Dark Energy Survey Three-Year Cosmological Sample

L. Kelsey, M. Sullivan, M. Smith +73

Analyses of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) have found puzzling correlations between their standardised luminosities and host galaxy properties: SNe Ia in high-mass, passive hosts appe…

astro-ph.CO2019★ 51 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and light around cosmic voids

Y. Fang, N. Hamaus, B. Jain +74

What are the mass and galaxy profiles of cosmic voids? In this paper we use two methods to extract voids in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaGiC galaxy sample to address th…

astro-ph.CO2018★ 61 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions

T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, A. Alarcon +164

We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave…

astro-ph.CO2018★ 97 cited

Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements

M. A. Troxel, E. Krause, C. Chang +76

We explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that assumes the absence of…

astro-ph.CO2018★ 51 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methodology and Projections for Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions

E. J. Baxter, Y. Omori, C. Chang +91

Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational lensing-induced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey (DES) collaboration used…

astro-ph.CO2017★ 36 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy Sample for BAO Measurement

M. Crocce, A. J. Ross, I. Sevilla-Noarbe +84

We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the prese…

astro-ph.CO2017★ 204 cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues

J. Zuntz, E. Sheldon, S. Samuroff +104

We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of . The catalogues cover two main fie…

astro-ph.CO2017★ 1.2k cited

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla +197

We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg of imaging data from the first year of the D…