469 citations · 1.4k across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Why is the winner the best?
Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Vivienn Weru +122
International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to in…
Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice
Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Vivienn Weru +352
The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known abou…
Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation
Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke, Patrick Godau +71
Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen…
BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challenges
Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke, Michal Kozubek +11
The number of biomedical image analysis challenges organized per year is steadily increasing. These international competitions have the purpose of benchmarking algorithms on common…
Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care
Lena Maier-Hein, Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke +35
International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. Given their scientific impact, it is surprising that a critical analysis of c…