activity
20192026
most citedError Bounds of Imitating Policies and Environments

18 citations · 48 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

19 papers

cs.LG2026

Non-Adversarial Imitation Learning Provably Free of Compounding Errors: The Value Flow Mechanism

Tian Xu, Chenyang Wang, Xiaochen Zhai +3

Adversarial imitation learning (AIL) achieves high-quality imitation by mitigating compounding errors inherent to behavioral cloning (BC), yet its adversarial optimization frequent…

cs.AI2025

A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning

Peng-Yuan Wang, Tian-Shuo Liu, Chenyang Wang +8

Mathematical reasoning has long represented one of the most fundamental and challenging frontiers in artificial intelligence research. In recent years, large language models (LLMs)…

cs.CL2025

Controlling Large Language Model with Latent Actions

Chengxing Jia, Ziniu Li, Pengyuan Wang +4

Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to downstream tasks using Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven to be an effective approach. However, LLMs do not inherently define the struc…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models

Ziniu Li, Congliang Chen, Tian Xu +4

Large Language Models (LLMs) typically rely on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) to specialize in downstream tasks, with the Cross Entropy (CE) loss being the de facto choice. However,…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain More

Yushun Zhang, Congliang Chen, Ziniu Li +6

We propose Adam-mini, an optimizer that achieves on par or better performance than AdamW with 50% less memory footprint. Adam-mini reduces memory by cutting down the learning rate…

cs.CL2024

BWArea Model: Learning World Model, Inverse Dynamics, and Policy for Controllable Language Generation

Chengxing Jia, Pengyuan Wang, Ziniu Li +4

Large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed a paradigm shift in natural language processing, yet their limited controllability poses a significant challenge for downstream applicat…

stat.ML2024★ 6 cited

On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularization

Jiancong Xiao, Ziniu Li, Xingyu Xie +4

Accurately aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is crucial for informing fair, economically sound, and statistically efficient decision-making processes. Ho…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspective

Yushun Zhang, Congliang Chen, Tian Ding +3

SGD performs worse than Adam by a significant margin on Transformers, but the reason remains unclear. In this work, we provide an explanation through the lens of Hessian: (i) Trans…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Policy Optimization in RLHF: The Impact of Out-of-preference Data

Ziniu Li, Tian Xu, Yang Yu

Aligning intelligent agents with human preferences and values is important. This paper examines two popular alignment methods: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Reward-Model…

cs.LG2023★ 7 cited

ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Models

Ziniu Li, Tian Xu, Yushun Zhang +4

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is key to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs), typically paired with the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. While PPO…

cs.LG2023

Provably Efficient Adversarial Imitation Learning with Unknown Transitions

Tian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang Yu +1

Imitation learning (IL) has proven to be an effective method for learning good policies from expert demonstrations. Adversarial imitation learning (AIL), a subset of IL methods, is…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Deploying Offline Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback

Ziniu Li, Ke Xu, Liu Liu +3

Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promise for decision-making tasks in real-world applications. One practical framework involves training parameterized policy models from an of…

cs.LG2023

Theoretical Analysis of Offline Imitation With Supplementary Dataset

Ziniu Li, Tian Xu, Yang Yu +1

Behavioral cloning (BC) can recover a good policy from abundant expert data, but may fail when expert data is insufficient. This paper considers a situation where, besides the smal…

cs.LG2022

Understanding Adversarial Imitation Learning in Small Sample Regime: A Stage-coupled Analysis

Tian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang Yu +1

Imitation learning learns a policy from expert trajectories. While the expert data is believed to be crucial for imitation quality, it was found that a kind of imitation learning a…

cs.LG2022

A Note on Target Q-learning For Solving Finite MDPs with A Generative Oracle

Ziniu Li, Tian Xu, Yang Yu

Q-learning with function approximation could diverge in the off-policy setting and the target network is a powerful technique to address this issue. In this manuscript, we examine…

cs.LG2022★ 1 cited

Rethinking ValueDice: Does It Really Improve Performance?

Ziniu Li, Tian Xu, Yang Yu +1

Since the introduction of GAIL, adversarial imitation learning (AIL) methods attract lots of research interests. Among these methods, ValueDice has achieved significant improvement…

cs.LG2021★ 3 cited

On Generalization of Adversarial Imitation Learning and Beyond

Tian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang Yu +1

Despite massive empirical evaluations, one of the fundamental questions in imitation learning is still not fully settled: does AIL (adversarial imitation learning) provably general…

cs.LG2020★ 18 cited

Error Bounds of Imitating Policies and Environments

Tian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang Yu

Imitation learning trains a policy by mimicking expert demonstrations. Various imitation methods were proposed and empirically evaluated, meanwhile, their theoretical understanding…

cs.LG2019★ 3 cited

On Value Discrepancy of Imitation Learning

Tian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang Yu

Imitation learning trains a policy from expert demonstrations. Imitation learning approaches have been designed from various principles, such as behavioral cloning via supervised l…