activity
20192026
most citedTowards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models

130 citations · 182 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

17 papers

cs.CY2026★ 2 cited

Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage

Mrinank Sharma, Miles McCain, Raymond Douglas +1

Although AI assistants are now deeply embedded in society, there has been limited empirical study of how their usage affects human empowerment. We present the first large-scale emp…

cs.CR2026

Eliciting Harmful Capabilities by Fine-Tuning On Safeguarded Outputs

Jackson Kaunismaa, Avery Griffin, John Hughes +3

Model developers implement safeguards in frontier models to prevent misuse, for example, by employing classifiers to filter dangerous outputs. In this work, we demonstrate that eve…

cs.CR2026

Constitutional Classifiers++: Efficient Production-Grade Defenses against Universal Jailbreaks

Hoagy Cunningham, Jerry Wei, Zihan Wang +26

We introduce enhanced Constitutional Classifiers that deliver production-grade jailbreak robustness with dramatically reduced computational costs and refusal rates compared to prev…

cs.AI2025

Chain-of-Thought Hijacking

Jianli Zhao, Tingchen Fu, Rylan Schaeffer +2

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) improve task performance through extended inference-time reasoning. Although previous studies suggest that longer reasoning should lead to more robust…

cs.LG2025

Towards Safeguarding LLM Fine-tuning APIs against Cipher Attacks

Jack Youstra, Mohammed Mahfoud, Yang Yan +3

Large language model fine-tuning APIs enable widespread model customization, yet pose significant safety risks. Recent work shows that adversaries can exploit access to these APIs…

cs.LG2025

Forecasting Rare Language Model Behaviors

Erik Jones, Meg Tong, Jesse Mu +7

Standard language model evaluations can fail to capture risks that emerge only at deployment scale. For example, a model may produce safe responses during a small-scale beta test,…

cs.CL2025★ 7 cited

Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teaming

Mrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Jesse Mu +40

Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to universal jailbreaks-prompting strategies that systematically bypass model safeguards and enable users to carry out harmful processes…

cs.CL2024

Best-of-N Jailbreaking

John Hughes, Sara Price, Aengus Lynch +7

We introduce Best-of-N (BoN) Jailbreaking, a simple black-box algorithm that jailbreaks frontier AI systems across modalities. BoN Jailbreaking works by repeatedly sampling variati…

cs.LG2024

Jailbreak Defense in a Narrow Domain: Limitations of Existing Methods and a New Transcript-Classifier Approach

Tony T. Wang, John Hughes, Henry Sleight +7

Defending large language models against jailbreaks so that they never engage in a broadly-defined set of forbidden behaviors is an open problem. In this paper, we investigate the d…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Adaptive Deployment of Untrusted LLMs Reduces Distributed Threats

Jiaxin Wen, Vivek Hebbar, Caleb Larson +9

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable, it is prudent to assess whether safety measures remain effective even if LLMs intentionally try to bypass them. Previou…

cs.CL2024

Rapid Response: Mitigating LLM Jailbreaks with a Few Examples

Alwin Peng, Julian Michael, Henry Sleight +2

As large language models (LLMs) grow more powerful, ensuring their safety against misuse becomes crucial. While researchers have focused on developing robust defenses, no method ha…

cs.CR2024★ 2 cited

PoisonBench: Assessing Large Language Model Vulnerability to Data Poisoning

Tingchen Fu, Mrinank Sharma, Philip Torr +3

Preference learning is a central component for aligning current LLMs, but this process can be vulnerable to data poisoning attacks. To address this concern, we introduce PoisonBenc…

cs.CL2024

Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models

Rylan Schaeffer, Dan Valentine, Luke Bailey +12

The integration of new modalities into frontier AI systems offers exciting capabilities, but also increases the possibility such systems can be adversarially manipulated in undesir…

cs.CR2024★ 39 cited

Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training

Evan Hubinger, Carson Denison, Jesse Mu +36

Humans are capable of strategically deceptive behavior: behaving helpfully in most situations, but then behaving very differently in order to pursue alternative objectives when giv…

cs.AI2023

Understanding and Controlling a Maze-Solving Policy Network

Ulisse Mini, Peli Grietzer, Mrinank Sharma +3

To understand the goals and goal representations of AI systems, we carefully study a pretrained reinforcement learning policy that solves mazes by navigating to a range of target s…

cs.CL2023★ 130 cited

Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models

Mrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak +16

Human feedback is commonly utilized to finetune AI assistants. But human feedback may also encourage model responses that match user beliefs over truthful ones, a behaviour known a…

stat.ML2019★ 1 cited

Differentially Private Federated Variational Inference

Mrinank Sharma, Michael Hutchinson, Siddharth Swaroop +2

In many real-world applications of machine learning, data are distributed across many clients and cannot leave the devices they are stored on. Furthermore, each client's data, comp…