works on

From the 1 of 7 linked papers with an AI index.

collaborators

7 papers

cs.AI2026

Valid Necessary: Diagnosing Latent Inefficiency in Chain-of-Thought

Daeyeop Lee, Hwanjo Yu

The paper identifies and diagnoses inefficient reasoning steps in chain-of-thought prompting for large language models, introducing a benchmark and a training-free metric (CAID) to…

cs.CL2026

Global PIQA: Evaluating Commonsense Reasoning Across 100+ Languages and Cultures

Tyler A. Chang, Catherine Arnett, Abdelrahman Sadallah +377

To date, there exist almost no culturally-specific evaluation benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) that cover a large number of languages and cultures. In this paper, we pre…

cs.CL2026

MAP4TS: A Multi-Aspect Prompting Framework for Time-Series Forecasting with Large Language Models

Suchan Lee, Jihoon Choi, Sohyeon Lee +4

Recent advances have investigated the use of pretrained large language models (LLMs) for time-series forecasting by aligning numerical inputs with LLM embedding spaces. However, ex…

cs.AI2026

COMPASS: A Framework for Evaluating Organization-Specific Policy Alignment in LLMs

Dasol Choi, DongGeon Lee, Brigitta Jesica Kartono +6

As large language models are deployed in high-stakes enterprise applications, from healthcare to finance, ensuring adherence to organization-specific policies has become essential.…

cs.CL2025

Everyday Physics in Korean Contexts: A Culturally Grounded Physical Reasoning Benchmark

Jihae Jeong, DaeYeop Lee, DongGeon Lee +1

Existing physical commonsense reasoning benchmarks predominantly focus on Western contexts, overlooking cultural variations in physical problem-solving. To address this gap, we int…

cs.CL2025

Are Vision-Language Models Safe in the Wild? A Meme-Based Benchmark Study

DongGeon Lee, Joonwon Jang, Jihae Jeong +1

Rapid deployment of vision-language models (VLMs) magnifies safety risks, yet most evaluations rely on artificial images. This study asks: How safe are current VLMs when confronted…