activity
20182022
most citedPeerReview4All: Fair and Accurate Reviewer Assignment in Peer Review

28 citations · 58 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

7 papers

cs.IR2022★ 2 cited

Integrating Rankings into Quantized Scores in Peer Review

Yusha Liu, Yichong Xu, Nihar B. Shah +1

In peer review, reviewers are usually asked to provide scores for the papers. The scores are then used by Area Chairs or Program Chairs in various ways in the decision-making proce…

cs.HC2020★ 5 cited

A Large Scale Randomized Controlled Trial on Herding in Peer-Review Discussions

Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Nihar B. Shah +2

Peer review is the backbone of academia and humans constitute a cornerstone of this process, being responsible for reviewing papers and making the final acceptance/rejection decisi…

cs.HC2020★ 1 cited

A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers in Large Conferences

Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B. Shah, Aarti Singh +1

Conference peer review constitutes a human-computation process whose importance cannot be overstated: not only it identifies the best submissions for acceptance, but, ultimately, i…

cs.DL2020★ 7 cited

Prior and Prejudice: The Novice Reviewers' Bias against Resubmissions in Conference Peer Review

Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B. Shah, Aarti Singh +1

Modern machine learning and computer science conferences are experiencing a surge in the number of submissions that challenges the quality of peer review as the number of competent…

cs.MA2020

Catch Me if I Can: Detecting Strategic Behaviour in Peer Assessment

Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B. Shah, Aarti Singh

We consider the issue of strategic behaviour in various peer-assessment tasks, including peer grading of exams or homeworks and peer review in hiring or promotions. When a peer-ass…

stat.ME2019★ 15 cited

On Testing for Biases in Peer Review

Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B. Shah, Aarti Singh

We consider the issue of biases in scholarly research, specifically, in peer review. There is a long standing debate on whether exposing author identities to reviewers induces bias…

stat.ML2018★ 28 cited

PeerReview4All: Fair and Accurate Reviewer Assignment in Peer Review

Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B. Shah, Aarti Singh

We consider the problem of automated assignment of papers to reviewers in conference peer review, with a focus on fairness and statistical accuracy. Our fairness objective is to ma…