activity
20202026
most citedA Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understanding

72 citations · 116 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

17 papers

cs.CL2026

Legibility is Not Interpretability: Comparing Judged and Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning

Kevin Du, Alexander Hoyle, Laura Ruis +1

Reasoning traces from chain-of-thought models appear to offer a legible window into how a model arrives at its answer. A growing body of work treats them as such, using LLM judges…

cs.CL2026

Position: It's Time to Optimize LLMs for Self-Consistency

Itamar Pres, Belinda Z. Li, Laura Ruis +6

Despite ever-increasing sophistication in language model (LM) pre- and post-training pipelines, many important failures persist: models overcondition on user framing ("sycophancy")…

cs.CL2026

Introspective Coupling: Self-Explanation Training Tracks Behavioral Change Despite Fixed Supervision

Zifan Carl Guo, Laura Ruis, Jacob Andreas +1

When does training language models (LMs) to generate explanations of their predictions yield faithful introspection, rather than superficial imitation? We study LMs trained to expl…

cs.LG2026

Self-CTRL: Self-Consistency Training with Reinforcement Learning

Itamar Pres, Laura Ruis, Melat Ghebreselassie +2

Language models (LMs) that faithfully describe their own behavior can more easily be audited, understood, and trusted by users. This paper describes Self-Consistency Training with…

cs.LG2026

Why Larger Models Learn More: Effects of Capacity, Interference, and Rare-Task Retention

Jing Huang, Daniel Wurgaft, Rachit Bansal +6

Larger models learn tasks smaller models do not. What drives this phenomenon? We develop a simple phenomenological argument that power-law scaling already suggests that a larger mo…

cs.LG2026

The Depth Ceiling: On the Limits of Large Language Models in Discovering Latent Planning

Yi Xu, Philipp Jettkant, Laura Ruis

The viability of chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring hinges on models being unable to reason effectively in their latent representations. Yet little is known about the limits of such…

cs.LG2026

Infusion: Shaping Model Behavior by Editing Training Data via Influence Functions

J Rosser, Robert Kirk, Edward Grefenstette +2

Influence functions are commonly used to attribute model behavior to training documents. We explore the reverse: crafting training data that induces model behavior. Our framework,…

cs.AI2025

Programming by Backprop: An Instruction is Worth 100 Examples When Finetuning LLMs

Jonathan Cook, Silvia Sapora, Arash Ahmadian +4

Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained to acquire behaviours from demonstrations or experience, yet much of their training data is declarative: instructions, rules, and…

cs.CL2025

Command A: An Enterprise-Ready Large Language Model

Team Cohere, :, Aakanksha +227

In this report we describe the development of Command A, a powerful large language model purpose-built to excel at real-world enterprise use cases. Command A is an agent-optimised…

cs.AI2025

Investigating Non-Transitivity in LLM-as-a-Judge

Yi Xu, Laura Ruis, Tim Rocktäschel +1

Automatic evaluation methods based on large language models (LLMs) are emerging as the standard tool for assessing the instruction-following abilities of LLM-based agents. The most…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Procedural Knowledge in Pretraining Drives Reasoning in Large Language Models

Laura Ruis, Maximilian Mozes, Juhan Bae +7

The capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models have been sketched out in great detail in recent years, providing an intriguing yet conflicting picture. On the one hand,…

cs.AI2024

Towards Reliable Evaluation of Behavior Steering Interventions in LLMs

Itamar Pres, Laura Ruis, Ekdeep Singh Lubana +1

Representation engineering methods have recently shown promise for enabling efficient steering of model behavior. However, evaluation pipelines for these methods have primarily rel…

cs.AI2024★ 11 cited

Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers

Akbir Khan, John Hughes, Dan Valentine +7

Common methods for aligning large language models (LLMs) with desired behaviour heavily rely on human-labelled data. However, as models grow increasingly sophisticated, they will s…

cs.CL2022★ 21 cited

The Goldilocks of Pragmatic Understanding: Fine-Tuning Strategy Matters for Implicature Resolution by LLMs

Laura Ruis, Akbir Khan, Stella Biderman +3

Despite widespread use of LLMs as conversational agents, evaluations of performance fail to capture a crucial aspect of communication: interpreting language in context -- incorpora…

cs.AI2022★ 4 cited

Improving Systematic Generalization Through Modularity and Augmentation

Laura Ruis, Brenden Lake

Systematic generalization is the ability to combine known parts into novel meaning; an important aspect of efficient human learning, but a weakness of neural network learning. In t…

cs.CL2020★ 72 cited

A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understanding

Laura Ruis, Jacob Andreas, Marco Baroni +2

Humans easily interpret expressions that describe unfamiliar situations composed from familiar parts ("greet the pink brontosaurus by the ferris wheel"). Modern neural networks, by…

cs.LG2020★ 7 cited

Insertion-Deletion Transformer

Laura Ruis, Mitchell Stern, Julia Proskurnia +1

We propose the Insertion-Deletion Transformer, a novel transformer-based neural architecture and training method for sequence generation. The model consists of two phases that are…