13 citations · 20 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
3 papers
stat.ME2024★ 7 cited
An alternative measure for quantifying the heterogeneity in meta-analysis
Ke Yang, Enxuan Lin, Wangli Xu +2
Quantifying the heterogeneity is an important issue in meta-analysis, and among the existing measures, the statistic is most commonly used. In this paper, we first illustrate…
stat.ME2021
IQ: Intrinsic measure for quantifying the heterogeneity in meta-analysis
Ke Yang, Enxuan Lin, Tiejun Tong
Quantifying the heterogeneity is an important issue in meta-analysis, and among the existing measures, the statistic is the most commonly used measure in the literature. In t…
stat.ME2020★ 13 cited
Fixed-effects model: the most convincing model for meta-analysis with few studies
Enxuan Lin, Tiejun Tong, Yong Chen +1
According to Davey et al. (2011) with a total of 22,453 meta-analyses from the January 2008 Issue of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the median number of studies inclu…