activity
20202026
most citedDifferentiable Reasoning over a Virtual Knowledge Base

44 citations · 125 across the 34 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

36 papers

cs.AI2026

ZEBRAARENA: A Diagnostic Simulation Environment for Studying Reasoning-Action Coupling in Tool-Augmented LLMs

Wanjia Zhao, Ludwig Schmidt, Yejin Choi +3

Tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) must tightly couple multi-step reasoning with external actions, yet existing benchmarks often confound this interplay with complex envir…

cs.CL2025

Reasoning Up the Instruction Ladder for Controllable Language Models

Zishuo Zheng, Vidhisha Balachandran, Chan Young Park +2

As large language model (LLM) based systems take on high-stakes roles in real-world decision-making, they must reconcile competing instructions from multiple sources within a singl…

cs.AI2025

Tracing the Traces: Latent Temporal Signals for Efficient and Accurate Reasoning

Martina G. Vilas, Safoora Yousefi, Besmira Nushi +2

Reasoning models improve their problem-solving ability through inference-time scaling, allocating more compute via longer token budgets. Identifying which reasoning traces are like…

cs.AI2025

Just Do It!? Computer-Use Agents Exhibit Blind Goal-Directedness

Erfan Shayegani, Keegan Hines, Yue Dong +6

Computer-Use Agents (CUAs) are an increasingly deployed class of agents that take actions on GUIs to accomplish user goals. In this paper, we show that CUAs consistently exhibit Bl…

cs.CL2025

Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning

Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Ahmed Awadallah, Vidhisha Balachandran +3

Large language models trained with reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards tend to trade accuracy for length--inflating response lengths to achieve gains in accuracy. While…

cs.AI2025

The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities

Yoshua Bengio, Tegan Maharaj, Luke Ong +84

Rapidly improving AI capabilities and autonomy hold significant promise of transformation, but are also driving vigorous debate on how to ensure that AI is safe, i.e., trustworthy,…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

Phi-4-reasoning Technical Report

Marah Abdin, Sahaj Agarwal, Ahmed Awadallah +20

We introduce Phi-4-reasoning, a 14-billion parameter reasoning model that achieves strong performance on complex reasoning tasks. Trained via supervised fine-tuning of Phi-4 on car…

cs.LG2025

Inference-Time Scaling for Complex Tasks: Where We Stand and What Lies Ahead

Vidhisha Balachandran, Jingya Chen, Lingjiao Chen +8

Inference-time scaling can enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) on complex problems that benefit from step-by-step problem solving. Although lengtheni…

cs.CL2025

FACTS&EVIDENCE: An Interactive Tool for Transparent Fine-Grained Factual Verification of Machine-Generated Text

Varich Boonsanong, Vidhisha Balachandran, Xiaochuang Han +3

With the widespread consumption of AI-generated content, there has been an increased focus on developing automated tools to verify the factual accuracy of such content. However, pr…

cs.CV2025

MM-GEN: Enhancing Task Performance Through Targeted Multimodal Data Curation

Siddharth Joshi, Besmira Nushi, Vidhisha Balachandran +4

Vision-language models (VLMs) are highly effective but often underperform on specialized tasks; for example, Llava-1.5 struggles with chart and diagram understanding due to scarce…

cs.LG2024

Unearthing Skill-Level Insights for Understanding Trade-Offs of Foundation Models

Mazda Moayeri, Vidhisha Balachandran, Varun Chandrasekaran +6

With models getting stronger, evaluations have grown more complex, testing multiple skills in one benchmark and even in the same instance at once. However, skill-wise performance i…

cs.LG2024

BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creation

Natasha Butt, Varun Chandrasekaran, Neel Joshi +2

Evaluation insights are limited by the availability of high-quality benchmarks. As models evolve, there is a need to create benchmarks that can measure progress on new and complex…

cs.CL2024

Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steering

Alessandro Stolfo, Vidhisha Balachandran, Safoora Yousefi +2

The ability to follow instructions is crucial for numerous real-world applications of language models. In pursuit of deeper insights and more powerful capabilities, we derive instr…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Eureka: Evaluating and Understanding Large Foundation Models

Vidhisha Balachandran, Jingya Chen, Neel Joshi +6

Rigorous and reproducible evaluation is critical for assessing the state of the art and for guiding scientific advances in Artificial Intelligence. Evaluation is challenging in pra…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models

Faeze Brahman, Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran +11

Chat-based language models are designed to be helpful, yet they should not comply with every user request. While most existing work primarily focuses on refusal of "unsafe" queries…

cs.CL2024

Teaching LLMs to Abstain across Languages via Multilingual Feedback

Shangbin Feng, Weijia Shi, Yike Wang +6

Multilingual LLMs often have knowledge disparities across languages, with larger gaps in under-resourced languages. Teaching LLMs to abstain in the face of knowledge gaps is thus a…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoning

Shuyue Stella Li, Vidhisha Balachandran, Shangbin Feng +4

Users typically engage with LLMs interactively, yet most existing benchmarks evaluate them in a static, single-turn format, posing reliability concerns in interactive scenarios. We…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Learning Syntax Without Planting Trees: Understanding Hierarchical Generalization in Transformers

Kabir Ahuja, Vidhisha Balachandran, Madhur Panwar +4

Transformers trained on natural language data have been shown to learn its hierarchical structure and generalize to sentences with unseen syntactic structures without explicitly en…

cs.CL2024★ 7 cited

Don't Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaboration

Shangbin Feng, Weijia Shi, Yike Wang +3

Despite efforts to expand the knowledge of large language models (LLMs), knowledge gaps -- missing or outdated information in LLMs -- might always persist given the evolving nature…

cs.CL2024★ 10 cited

Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models

Abhika Mishra, Akari Asai, Vidhisha Balachandran +4

Large language models (LMs) are prone to generate factual errors, which are often called hallucinations. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations and…

cs.CL2023

P^3SUM: Preserving Author's Perspective in News Summarization with Diffusion Language Models

Yuhan Liu, Shangbin Feng, Xiaochuang Han +4

In this work, we take a first step towards designing summarization systems that are faithful to the author's intent, not only the semantic content of the article. Focusing on a cas…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

KGQuiz: Evaluating the Generalization of Encoded Knowledge in Large Language Models

Yuyang Bai, Shangbin Feng, Vidhisha Balachandran +4

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable performance on knowledge-intensive tasks, suggesting that real-world knowledge is encoded in their model parameters. However, be…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Knowledge Crosswords: Geometric Knowledge Reasoning with Large Language Models

Wenxuan Ding, Shangbin Feng, Yuhan Liu +4

We propose Knowledge Crosswords, a geometric knowledge reasoning benchmark consisting of incomplete knowledge networks bounded by structured factual constraints, where LLMs are tas…

cs.CL2023★ 6 cited

Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Models

Yike Wang, Shangbin Feng, Heng Wang +4

Large language models (LLMs) often encounter knowledge conflicts, scenarios where discrepancy arises between the internal parametric knowledge of LLMs and non-parametric informatio…