activity
20202026
most citedRAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment

32 citations · 93 across the 30 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

34 papers

cs.AI2026

Model What Matters: Decision-Guided Selective World Modeling for Language Agents

Maolin Ran, Minda Chen, Di Huang +3

Reinforcement learning provides a direct mechanism for optimizing task objectives in large language model-driven agents, but task rewards are typically sparse trajectory-level sign…

cs.LG2026

Past, Future, All at Once: Mitigating Stability-Plasticity Dilemma via Post-hoc JANUS Rectification

Zhilong Zheng, Letian Tao, Yang Guan +7

Fine-tuning foundation models on new tasks inevitably suffer from catastrophic forgetting. While existing works attempt to mitigate this on the basis of parameter-efficient fine-tu…

cs.LG2026

Beyond Token-Local Imitation: Reward-Compatible Temporal Credit Assignment for On-Policy Distillation

Shiqi Liu, Zeyu He, Letian Tao +9

On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as an effective approach for large language model post-training, yet existing objectives face a trade-off between objective fidelity and op…

cs.AI2026

Coalition-Aware Skill Reliability for Self-Evolving Agents

Qiyan Zhao, Xiaofeng Zhang, Bo Liu +11

Agent skills, structured artifacts distilled from interaction trajectories and dynamically reused from skill banks, have become a central mechanism for enabling large language mode…

cs.LG2025

Reinforce-Ada: An Adaptive Sampling Framework under Non-linear RL Objectives

Wei Xiong, Chenlu Ye, Baohao Liao +6

Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model reasoning is frequently hindered by signal loss, a phenomenon where standard uniform sampling with small group sizes fails to u…

cs.AI2025

StepWiser: Stepwise Generative Judges for Wiser Reasoning

Wei Xiong, Wenting Zhao, Weizhe Yuan +4

As models increasingly leverage multi-step reasoning strategies to solve complex problems, supervising the logical validity of these intermediate steps has become a critical resear…

cs.LG2025

Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Reasoners via Gradient Variance Minimization in Rejection Sampling and RL

Jiarui Yao, Yifan Hao, Hanning Zhang +4

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in large language models (LLMs) can be formalized as a latent variable problem, where the model needs to generate intermediate reasoning steps. Whi…

cs.LG2025

A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforce

Wei Xiong, Jiarui Yao, Yuhui Xu +8

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a prevailing approach for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks. Among recent methods, GRPO stands out for its…

cs.AI2025

Self-rewarding correction for mathematical reasoning

Wei Xiong, Hanning Zhang, Chenlu Ye +3

We study self-rewarding reasoning large language models (LLMs), which can simultaneously generate step-by-step reasoning and evaluate the correctness of their outputs during the in…

cs.LG2025

Logarithmic Regret for Online KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning

Heyang Zhao, Chenlu Ye, Wei Xiong +2

Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) have shown that KL-regularization plays a pivotal role in improving the efficiency of RL fine-tuning for large…

cs.CL2024

From Lists to Emojis: How Format Bias Affects Model Alignment

Xuanchang Zhang, Wei Xiong, Lichang Chen +3

In this paper, we study format biases in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). We observe that many widely-used preference models, including human evaluators, GPT-4, a…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Building Math Agents with Multi-Turn Iterative Preference Learning

Wei Xiong, Chengshuai Shi, Jiaming Shen +10

Recent studies have shown that large language models' (LLMs) mathematical problem-solving capabilities can be enhanced by integrating external tools, such as code interpreters, and…

cs.LG2024

Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts

Haoxiang Wang, Wei Xiong, Tengyang Xie +2

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the primary method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. The RLHF process typically sta…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF

Hanze Dong, Wei Xiong, Bo Pang +7

We present the workflow of Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in this technical report, which is widely reported to outperform its offline counterpa…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Strengthening Multimodal Large Language Model with Bootstrapped Preference Optimization

Renjie Pi, Tianyang Han, Wei Xiong +4

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in generating responses based on visual inputs. However, they often suffer from a bias towards generating responses similar to their…

cs.LG2024

DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF

Han Zhong, Zikang Shan, Guhao Feng +6

In the classical Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is employed to learn from sparse, sentence-level rewards -- a chall…

cs.LG2024

Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards

Haoxiang Wang, Yong Lin, Wei Xiong +5

Fine-grained control over large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge, hindering their adaptability to diverse user needs. While Reinforcement Learning from Human…

cs.LG2024

Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Model

Chenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang +3

We investigate Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in the context of a general preference oracle. In particular, we do not assume the existence of a reward function a…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint

Wei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye +5

This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular m…

cs.LG2023★ 10 cited

Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHF

Yong Lin, Hangyu Lin, Wei Xiong +14

LLMs acquire a wide range of abilities during pre-training, but aligning LLMs under Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) can lead to forgetting pretrained abilities, w…

stat.ML2023

Provably Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning with Perturbed Data Sources

Chengshuai Shi, Wei Xiong, Cong Shen +1

Existing theoretical studies on offline reinforcement learning (RL) mostly consider a dataset sampled directly from the target task. In practice, however, data often come from seve…

cs.CL2023★ 6 cited

LMFlow: An Extensible Toolkit for Finetuning and Inference of Large Foundation Models

Shizhe Diao, Rui Pan, Hanze Dong +4

Foundation models have demonstrated a great ability to achieve general human-level intelligence far beyond traditional approaches. As the technique keeps attracting attention from…

stat.ML2023

Reward Teaching for Federated Multi-armed Bandits

Chengshuai Shi, Wei Xiong, Cong Shen +1

Most of the existing federated multi-armed bandits (FMAB) designs are based on the presumption that clients will implement the specified design to collaborate with the server. In r…

cs.LG2023★ 32 cited

RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment

Hanze Dong, Wei Xiong, Deepanshu Goyal +7

Generative foundation models are susceptible to implicit biases that can arise from extensive unsupervised training data. Such biases can produce suboptimal samples, skewed outcome…