most citedArgument Undermining: Counter-Argument Generation by Attacking Weak Premises

2 citations · 4 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2021

Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization

Milad Alshomary, Timon Gurcke, Shahbaz Syed +5

Key point analysis is the task of extracting a set of concise and high-level statements from a given collection of arguments, representing the gist of these arguments. This paper p…

cs.CL2021

Summary Explorer: Visualizing the State of the Art in Text Summarization

Shahbaz Syed, Tariq Yousef, Khalid Al-Khatib +2

This paper introduces Summary Explorer, a new tool to support the manual inspection of text summarization systems by compiling the outputs of 55~state-of-the-art single document su…

cs.CL20212 cited

Generating Informative Conclusions for Argumentative Texts

Shahbaz Syed, Khalid Al-Khatib, Milad Alshomary +2

The purpose of an argumentative text is to support a certain conclusion. Yet, they are often omitted, expecting readers to infer them rather. While appropriate when reading an indi…

cs.CL20212 cited

Argument Undermining: Counter-Argument Generation by Attacking Weak Premises

Milad Alshomary, Shahbaz Syed, Arkajit Dhar +2

Text generation has received a lot of attention in computational argumentation research as of recent. A particularly challenging task is the generation of counter-arguments. So far…

cs.IR2020

Abstractive Snippet Generation

Wei-Fan Chen, Shahbaz Syed, Benno Stein +2

An abstractive snippet is an originally created piece of text to summarize a web page on a search engine results page. Compared to the conventional extractive snippets, which are g…