activity
20172025
most citedAdversarial Filters of Dataset Biases

160 citations · 668 across the 33 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

41 papers

cs.CL2025

Information-Guided Identification of Training Data Imprint in (Proprietary) Large Language Models

Abhilasha Ravichander, Jillian Fisher, Taylor Sorensen +6

High-quality training data has proven crucial for developing performant large language models (LLMs). However, commercial LLM providers disclose few, if any, details about the data…

cs.CL2023

NovaCOMET: Open Commonsense Foundation Models with Symbolic Knowledge Distillation

Peter West, Ronan Le Bras, Taylor Sorensen +8

We present NovaCOMET, an open commonsense knowledge model, that combines the best aspects of knowledge and general task models. Compared to previous knowledge models, NovaCOMET all…

cs.CL2023★ 10 cited

The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning

Bill Yuchen Lin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Ximing Lu +5

The alignment tuning process of large language models (LLMs) typically involves instruction learning through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and preference tuning via reinforcement le…

cs.CL2023

"You Are An Expert Linguistic Annotator": Limits of LLMs as Analyzers of Abstract Meaning Representation

Allyson Ettinger, Jena D. Hwang, Valentina Pyatkin +2

Large language models (LLMs) show amazing proficiency and fluency in the use of language. Does this mean that they have also acquired insightful linguistic knowledge about the lang…

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement

Linlu Qiu, Liwei Jiang, Ximing Lu +8

The ability to derive underlying principles from a handful of observations and then generalize to novel situations -- known as inductive reasoning -- is central to human intelligen…

cs.CL2023★ 31 cited

Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties

Taylor Sorensen, Liwei Jiang, Jena Hwang +10

Human values are crucial to human decision-making. Value pluralism is the view that multiple correct values may be held in tension with one another (e.g., when considering lying to…

cs.CL2023★ 3 cited

PlaSma: Making Small Language Models Better Procedural Knowledge Models for (Counterfactual) Planning

Faeze Brahman, Chandra Bhagavatula, Valentina Pyatkin +7

Procedural planning, which entails decomposing a high-level goal into a sequence of temporally ordered steps, is an important yet intricate task for machines. It involves integrati…

cs.CL2023★ 71 cited

Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality

Nouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar +13

Transformer large language models (LLMs) have sparked admiration for their exceptional performance on tasks that demand intricate multi-step reasoning. Yet, these models simultaneo…

cs.CL2023★ 31 cited

SwiftSage: A Generative Agent with Fast and Slow Thinking for Complex Interactive Tasks

Bill Yuchen Lin, Yicheng Fu, Karina Yang +6

We introduce SwiftSage, a novel agent framework inspired by the dual-process theory of human cognition, designed to excel in action planning for complex interactive reasoning tasks…

cs.CL2022★ 5 cited

ClarifyDelphi: Reinforced Clarification Questions with Defeasibility Rewards for Social and Moral Situations

Valentina Pyatkin, Jena D. Hwang, Vivek Srikumar +4

Context is everything, even in commonsense moral reasoning. Changing contexts can flip the moral judgment of an action; "Lying to a friend" is wrong in general, but may be morally…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

I2D2: Inductive Knowledge Distillation with NeuroLogic and Self-Imitation

Chandra Bhagavatula, Jena D. Hwang, Doug Downey +7

Commonsense capabilities of pre-trained language models dramatically improve with scale, leading many to believe that scale is the only winning recipe. But is it? Here, we investig…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Code

Sebastian Gehrmann, Abhik Bhattacharjee, Abinaya Mahendiran +74

Evaluation in machine learning is usually informed by past choices, for example which datasets or metrics to use. This standardization enables the comparison on equal footing using…

cs.CL2022

ACCoRD: A Multi-Document Approach to Generating Diverse Descriptions of Scientific Concepts

Sonia K. Murthy, Kyle Lo, Daniel King +7

Systems that can automatically define unfamiliar terms hold the promise of improving the accessibility of scientific texts, especially for readers who may lack prerequisite backgro…

cs.CL2022★ 8 cited

Maieutic Prompting: Logically Consistent Reasoning with Recursive Explanations

Jaehun Jung, Lianhui Qin, Sean Welleck +4

Despite their impressive capabilities, large pre-trained language models (LMs) struggle with consistent reasoning; recently, prompting LMs to generate explanations that self-guide…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

Penguins Don't Fly: Reasoning about Generics through Instantiations and Exceptions

Emily Allaway, Jena D. Hwang, Chandra Bhagavatula +3

Generics express generalizations about the world (e.g., birds can fly) that are not universally true (e.g., newborn birds and penguins cannot fly). Commonsense knowledge bases, use…

cs.CV2022

The Abduction of Sherlock Holmes: A Dataset for Visual Abductive Reasoning

Jack Hessel, Jena D. Hwang, Jae Sung Park +5

Humans have remarkable capacity to reason abductively and hypothesize about what lies beyond the literal content of an image. By identifying concrete visual clues scattered through…

cs.CL2021

Can Machines Learn Morality? The Delphi Experiment

Liwei Jiang, Jena D. Hwang, Chandra Bhagavatula +12

As AI systems become increasingly powerful and pervasive, there are growing concerns about machines' morality or a lack thereof. Yet, teaching morality to machines is a formidable…

cs.CL2021★ 11 cited

DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Experts

Alisa Liu, Maarten Sap, Ximing Lu +4

Despite recent advances in natural language generation, it remains challenging to control attributes of generated text. We propose DExperts: Decoding-time Experts, a decoding-time…

cs.CL2021★ 3 cited

"I'm Not Mad": Commonsense Implications of Negation and Contradiction

Liwei Jiang, Antoine Bosselut, Chandra Bhagavatula +1

Natural language inference requires reasoning about contradictions, negations, and their commonsense implications. Given a simple premise (e.g., "I'm mad at you"), humans can reaso…

cs.CL2021

UNICORN on RAINBOW: A Universal Commonsense Reasoning Model on a New Multitask Benchmark

Nicholas Lourie, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula +1

Commonsense AI has long been seen as a near impossible goal -- until recently. Now, research interest has sharply increased with an influx of new benchmarks and models. We propose…

cs.CL2021

On-the-Fly Attention Modulation for Neural Generation

Yue Dong, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ximing Lu +4

Despite considerable advancements with deep neural language models (LMs), neural text generation still suffers from degeneration: the generated text is repetitive, generic, self-co…

cs.CL2020

Natural Language Rationales with Full-Stack Visual Reasoning: From Pixels to Semantic Frames to Commonsense Graphs

Ana Marasović, Chandra Bhagavatula, Jae Sung Park +3

Natural language rationales could provide intuitive, higher-level explanations that are easily understandable by humans, complementing the more broadly studied lower-level explanat…

cs.CL2020★ 11 cited

NeuroLogic Decoding: (Un)supervised Neural Text Generation with Predicate Logic Constraints

Ximing Lu, Peter West, Rowan Zellers +3

Conditional text generation often requires lexical constraints, i.e., which words should or shouldn't be included in the output text. While the dominant recipe for conditional text…

cs.CL2020

Reflective Decoding: Beyond Unidirectional Generation with Off-the-Shelf Language Models

Peter West, Ximing Lu, Ari Holtzman +3

Publicly available, large pretrained LanguageModels (LMs) generate text with remarkable quality, but only sequentially from left to right. As a result, they are not immediately app…