activity
20192025
most citedOn the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models

2.3k citations · 3.6k across the 40 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2023Show all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2023★ 10 cited

Evaluating and Mitigating Discrimination in Language Model Decisions

Alex Tamkin, Amanda Askell, Liane Lovitt +6

As language models (LMs) advance, interest is growing in applying them to high-stakes societal decisions, such as determining financing or housing eligibility. However, their poten…

cs.CL2023★ 8 cited

Specific versus General Principles for Constitutional AI

Sandipan Kundu, Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath +33

Human feedback can prevent overtly harmful utterances in conversational models, but may not automatically mitigate subtle problematic behaviors such as a stated desire for self-pre…

cs.CL2023★ 130 cited

Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models

Mrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak +16

Human feedback is commonly utilized to finetune AI assistants. But human feedback may also encourage model responses that match user beliefs over truthful ones, a behaviour known a…

cs.LG2023★ 26 cited

Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functions

Roger Grosse, Juhan Bae, Cem Anil +14

When trying to gain better visibility into a machine learning model in order to understand and mitigate the associated risks, a potentially valuable source of evidence is: which tr…

cs.CL2023★ 8 cited

Question Decomposition Improves the Faithfulness of Model-Generated Reasoning

Ansh Radhakrishnan, Karina Nguyen, Anna Chen +21

As large language models (LLMs) perform more difficult tasks, it becomes harder to verify the correctness and safety of their behavior. One approach to help with this issue is to p…

cs.AI2023★ 29 cited

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Tamera Lanham, Anna Chen, Ansh Radhakrishnan +27

Large language models (LLMs) perform better when they produce step-by-step, "Chain-of-Thought" (CoT) reasoning before answering a question, but it is unclear if the stated reasonin…

cs.SI2023★ 21 cited

Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Polis

Christopher T. Small, Ivan Vendrov, Esin Durmus +6

Polis is a platform that leverages machine intelligence to scale up deliberative processes. In this paper, we explore the opportunities and risks associated with applying Large Lan…

cs.CL2023★ 45 cited

Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models

Esin Durmus, Karina Nguyen, Thomas I. Liao +15

Large language models (LLMs) may not equitably represent diverse global perspectives on societal issues. In this paper, we develop a quantitative framework to evaluate whose opinio…

cs.CL2023★ 32 cited

Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Models

Myra Cheng, Esin Durmus, Dan Jurafsky

To recognize and mitigate harms from large language models (LLMs), we need to understand the prevalence and nuances of stereotypes in LLM outputs. Toward this end, we present Marke…

cs.CL2023★ 101 cited

Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?

Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak +3

Language models (LMs) are increasingly being used in open-ended contexts, where the opinions reflected by LMs in response to subjective queries can have a profound impact, both on…

cs.CL2023★ 64 cited

Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization

Tianyi Zhang, Faisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus +3

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for automatic summarization but the reasons behind their successes are poorly understood. By conducting a human evaluation on ten LL…