activity
20172021
most citedPhoneme-to-viseme mappings: the good, the bad, and the ugly

59 citations · 115 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

24 papers

eess.AS2021

An evaluation of data augmentation methods for sound scene geotagging

Helen L. Bear, Veronica Morfi, Emmanouil Benetos

Sound scene geotagging is a new topic of research which has evolved from acoustic scene classification. It is motivated by the idea of audio surveillance. Not content with only des…

eess.AS2021

Visually Exploring Multi-Purpose Audio Data

David Heise, Helen L. Bear

We analyse multi-purpose audio using tools to visualise similarities within the data that may be observed via unsupervised methods. The success of machine learning classifiers is a…

eess.AS2020

Memory Controlled Sequential Self Attention for Sound Recognition

Arjun Pankajakshan, Helen L. Bear, Vinod Subramanian +1

In this paper we investigate the importance of the extent of memory in sequential self attention for sound recognition. We propose to use a memory controlled sequential self attent…

eess.IV2019★ 13 cited

Alternative Visual Units for an Optimized Phoneme-Based Lipreading System

Helen Bear, Richard Harvey

Lipreading is understanding speech from observed lip movements. An observed series of lip motions is an ordered sequence of visual lip gestures. These gestures are commonly known,…

eess.AS2019

Polyphonic Sound Event and Sound Activity Detection: A Multi-task approach

Arjun Pankajakshan, Helen L. Bear, Emmanouil Benetos

Polyphonic Sound Event Detection (SED) in real-world recordings is a challenging task because of the dynamic polyphony level, intensity, and duration of sound events. Current polyp…

eess.AS2019

City classification from multiple real-world sound scenes

Helen L. Bear, Toni Heittola, Annamaria Mesaros +2

The majority of sound scene analysis work focuses on one of two clearly defined tasks: acoustic scene classification or sound event detection. Whilst this separation of tasks is us…

eess.AS2019

Towards joint sound scene and polyphonic sound event recognition

Helen L. Bear, Ines Nolasco, Emmanouil Benetos

Acoustic Scene Classification (ASC) and Sound Event Detection (SED) are two separate tasks in the field of computational sound scene analysis. In this work, we present a new datase…

cs.SD2018

Audio-based identification of beehive states

Inês Nolasco, Alessandro Terenzi, Stefania Cecchi +3

The absence of the queen in a beehive is a very strong indicator of the need for beekeeper intervention. Manually searching for the queen is an arduous recurrent task for beekeeper…

cs.CV2018

The speaker-independent lipreading play-off; a survey of lipreading machines

Jake Burton, David Frank, Madhi Saleh +2

Lipreading is a difficult gesture classification task. One problem in computer lipreading is speaker-independence. Speaker-independence means to achieve the same accuracy on test s…

cs.SD2018★ 4 cited

An extensible cluster-graph taxonomy for open set sound scene analysis

Helen L Bear, Emmanouil Benetos

We present a new extensible and divisible taxonomy for open set sound scene analysis. This new model allows complex scene analysis with tangible descriptors and perception labels.…

eess.AS2018★ 2 cited

Visual Speech Language Models

Helen L Bear

Language models (LM) are very powerful in lipreading systems. Language models built upon the ground truth utterances of datasets learn grammar and structure rules of words and sent…

eess.IV2018

Comparing heterogeneous visual gestures for measuring the diversity of visual speech signals

Helen L Bear, Richard Harvey

Visual lip gestures observed whilst lipreading have a few working definitions, the most common two are; `the visual equivalent of a phoneme' and `phonemes which are indistinguishab…

cs.CV2018★ 59 cited

Phoneme-to-viseme mappings: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Helen L Bear, Richard Harvey

Visemes are the visual equivalent of phonemes. Although not precisely defined, a working definition of a viseme is "a set of phonemes which have identical appearance on the lips".…

cs.CV2018★ 16 cited

Comparing phonemes and visemes with DNN-based lipreading

Kwanchiva Thangthai, Helen L Bear, Richard Harvey

There is debate if phoneme or viseme units are the most effective for a lipreading system. Some studies use phoneme units even though phonemes describe unique short sounds; other s…

cs.CV2017

Understanding the visual speech signal

Helen L Bear

For machines to lipread, or understand speech from lip movement, they decode lip-motions (known as visemes) into the spoken sounds. We investigate the visual speech channel to furt…

cs.CV2017★ 5 cited

Visual gesture variability between talkers in continuous visual speech

Helen L Bear

Recent adoption of deep learning methods to the field of machine lipreading research gives us two options to pursue to improve system performance. Either, we develop end-to-end sys…

cs.CV2017★ 3 cited

Visual speech recognition: aligning terminologies for better understanding

Helen L Bear, Sarah Taylor

We are at an exciting time for machine lipreading. Traditional research stemmed from the adaptation of audio recognition systems. But now, the computer vision community is also par…

cs.CV2017

Decoding visemes: improving machine lipreading

Helen L Bear

Machine lipreading (MLR) is speech recognition from visual cues and a niche research problem in speech processing & computer vision. Current challenges fall into two groups: the co…

cs.CV2017

Decoding visemes: improving machine lipreading

Helen L. Bear, Richard Harvey

To undertake machine lip-reading, we try to recognise speech from a visual signal. Current work often uses viseme classification supported by language models with varying degrees o…

cs.CV2017★ 11 cited

Finding phonemes: improving machine lip-reading

Helen L. Bear, Richard W. Harvey, Yuxuan Lan

In machine lip-reading there is continued debate and research around the correct classes to be used for recognition. In this paper we use a structured approach for devising speaker…

cs.CV2017★ 1 cited

Speaker-independent machine lip-reading with speaker-dependent viseme classifiers

Helen L. Bear, Stephen J. Cox, Richard W. Harvey

In machine lip-reading, which is identification of speech from visual-only information, there is evidence to show that visual speech is highly dependent upon the speaker [1]. Here,…

cs.CV2017★ 1 cited

Which phoneme-to-viseme maps best improve visual-only computer lip-reading?

Helen L. Bear, Richard W. Harvey, Barry-John Theobald +1

A critical assumption of all current visual speech recognition systems is that there are visual speech units called visemes which can be mapped to units of acoustic speech, the pho…

cs.CV2017

Some observations on computer lip-reading: moving from the dream to the reality

Helen L. Bear, Gari Owen, Richard Harvey +1

In the quest for greater computer lip-reading performance there are a number of tacit assumptions which are either present in the datasets (high resolution for example) or in the m…

cs.CV2017

Resolution limits on visual speech recognition

Helen L. Bear, Richard Harvey, Barry-John Theobald +1

Visual-only speech recognition is dependent upon a number of factors that can be difficult to control, such as: lighting; identity; motion; emotion and expression. But some factors…