130 citations · 529 across the 35 of their papers we have counts for
31 papers · 1 filter
Supporting the understanding of ontologies for scientific knowledge graphs with the new version of LODE
Valentina Pasqual, Ahmadreza Nazari, Silvio Peroni
Scientific Knowledge Graphs (SKGs) rely on increasingly complex and heterogeneous semantic models, whose reuse and interoperability require ontologies and other semantic artefacts…
Retractions in Arts and Humanities: an Analysis of the Retraction Notices
Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni
The aim of this work is to understand the retraction phenomenon in the arts and humanities domain through an analysis of the retraction notices: formal documents stating and descri…
OpenCitations Meta
Arcangelo Massari, Fabio Mariani, Ivan Heibi +2
OpenCitations Meta is a new database for open bibliographic metadata of scholarly publications involved in the citations indexed by the OpenCitations infrastructure, adhering to Op…
Representing provenance and track changes of cultural heritage metadata in RDF: a survey of existing approaches
Arcangelo Massari, Silvio Peroni, Francesca Tomasi +1
In the realm of Digital Humanities, the management of cultural heritage metadata is pivotal for ensuring data trustworthiness. Provenance information - contextual metadata detailin…
A maturity model for catalogues of semantic artefacts
Oscar Corcho, Fajar J. Ekaputra, Ivan Heibi +4
This work presents a maturity model for assessing catalogues of semantic artefacts, one of the keystones that permit semantic interoperability of systems. We defined the dimensions…
Approaching Digital Humanities at the University: a Cultural Challenge
Silvio Peroni, Francesca Tomasi
The University of Bologna has a long tradition in Digital Humanities, both at the level of research and teaching. In this article, we want to introduce some experiences in developi…
Structured references from PDF articles: assessing the tools for bibliographic reference extraction and parsing
Alessia Cioffi, Silvio Peroni
Many solutions have been provided to extract bibliographic references from PDF papers. Machine learning, rule-based and regular expressions approaches were among the most used meth…
The way we cite: common metadata used across disciplines for defining bibliographic references
Erika Alves dos Santos, Silvio Peroni, Marcos Luiz Mucheroni
Current citation practices observed in articles are very noisy, confusing, and not standardised, making identifying the cited works problematic for hu-mans and any reference extrac…
What do we mean by "data"? A proposed classification of data types in the arts and humanities
Bianca Gualandi, Luca Pareschi, Silvio Peroni
Purpose: This article describes the interviews we conducted in late 2021 with 19 researchers at the Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies at the University of Bolog…
An analysis of citing and referencing habits across all scholarly disciplines: approaches and trends in bibliographic referencing and citing practices
Erika Alves dos Santos, Silvio Peroni, Marcos Luiz Mucheroni
Purpose. In this study, we want to identify current possible causes for citing and referencing errors in scholarly literature to compare if something changed from the snapshot prov…
Identifying and correcting invalid citations due to DOI errors in Crossref data
Alessia Cioffi, Sara Coppini, Arcangelo Massari +4
This work aims to identify classes of DOI mistakes by analysing the open bibliographic metadata available in Crossref, highlighting which publishers were responsible for such mista…
A quantitative and qualitative open citation analysis of retracted articles in the humanities
Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni
In this article, we show and discuss the results of a quantitative and qualitative analysis of open citations to retracted publications in the humanities domain. Our study was cond…
Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: measuring coverage of academic fields
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
The importance of open bibliographic repositories is widely accepted by the scientific community. For evaluation processes, however, there is still some skepticism: even if large r…
The case for the Humanities Citation Index (HuCI): a citation index by the humanities, for the humanities
Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni, Matteo Romanello
Citation indexes are by now part of the research infrastructure in use by most scientists: a necessary tool in order to cope with the increasing amounts of scientific literature be…
A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources
Gianmarco Spinaci, Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni
Purpose. This study presents the results of an experiment we performed to measure the coverage of Digital Humanities (DH) publications in mainstream open and proprietary bibliograp…
BiblioDAP: The 1st Workshop on Bibliographic Data Analysis and Processing
Zeyd Boukhers, Philipp Mayr, Silvio Peroni
Automatic processing of bibliographic data becomes very important in digital libraries, data science and machine learning due to its importance in keeping pace with the significant…
Academics evaluating academics: a methodology to inform the review process on top of open citations
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
In the past, several works have investigated ways for combining quantitative and qualitative methods in research assessment exercises. In this work, we aim at introducing a methodo…
A protocol to gather, characterize and analyze incoming citations of retracted articles
Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni
In this article, we present a methodology which takes as input a collection of retracted articles, gathers the entities citing them, characterizes such entities according to multip…
Can we assess research using open scientific knowledge graphs? A case study within the Italian National Scientific Qualification
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
The need for open scientific knowledge graphs is ever increasing. While there are large repositories of open access articles and free publication indexes, there are still few free…
Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
In the past, several works have investigated ways for combining quantitative and qualitative methods in research assessment exercises. Indeed, the Italian National Scientific Quali…
A qualitative and quantitative analysis of open citations to retracted articles: the Wakefield et al.'s case
Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni
In this article, we show the results of a quantitative and qualitative analysis of open citations on a popular and highly cited retracted paper: "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia…
MITAO: a tool for enabling scholars in the Humanities to use Topic Modelling in their studies
Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni, Luca Pareschi +1
Automatic text analysis methods, such as Topic Modelling, are gaining much attention in Humanities. However, scholars need to have extensive coding skills to use such methods appro…
Citing and referencing habits in Medicine and Social Sciences journals in 2019
Erika Alves dos Santos, Silvio Peroni, Marcos Luiz Mucheroni
This article explores citing and referencing systems in Social Sciences and Medicine articles from different theoretical and practical perspectives, considering bibliographic refer…
The OpenCitations Data Model
Marilena Daquino, Silvio Peroni, David Shotton +6
A variety of schemas and ontologies are currently used for the machine-readable description of bibliographic entities and citations. This diversity, and the reuse of the same ontol…