activity
20162026
most citedDirections in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Out

316 citations · 618 across the 41 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

43 papers

cs.CL2026

APEX-Accounting

Julien Benchek, Austin Bennett, Jasmin Kern +8

We introduce APEX-Accounting, a benchmark built by Mercor in partnership with Ramp, to assess whether frontier models can do the real work of accountants. Tasks include reconciling…

cs.CL2026

PRISM-X: Experiments on Personalised Fine-Tuning with Human and Simulated Users

Hannah Rose Kirk, Liu Leqi, Fanzhi Zeng +4

Personalisation is a standard feature of conversational AI systems used by millions; yet, the efficacy of personalisation methods is often evaluated in academic research using simu…

cs.CL2026

APEX-Agents

Bertie Vidgen, Austin Mann, Abby Fennelly +21

We introduce the AI Productivity Index for Agents (APEX-Agents), a benchmark for assessing whether AI agents can execute long-horizon, cross-application tasks created by investment…

cs.SE2026

APEX-SWE

Abhi Kottamasu, Chirag Mahapatra, Sam Lee +10

We introduce the AI Productivity Index for Software Engineering (APEX-SWE), a benchmark for assessing whether frontier AI models can execute economically valuable software engineer…

cs.AI2025

The AI Consumer Index (ACE)

Julien Benchek, Rohit Shetty, Benjamin Hunsberger +5

We introduce the first version of the AI Consumer Index (ACE), a benchmark for assessing whether frontier AI models can perform everyday consumer tasks. ACE contains a hidden heldo…

cs.HC2025★ 2 cited

Neural steering vectors reveal dose and exposure-dependent impacts of human-AI relationships

Hannah Rose Kirk, Henry Davidson, Ed Saunders +4

Humans are increasingly forming parasocial relationships with AI systems, and modern AI shows an increasing tendency to display social and relationship-seeking behaviour. However,…

cs.CL2025

A Good Plan is Hard to Find: Aligning Models with Preferences is Misaligned with What Helps Users

Nishant Balepur, Matthew Shu, Yoo Yeon Sung +5

To assist users in complex tasks, LLMs generate plans: step-by-step instructions towards a goal. While alignment methods aim to ensure LLM plans are helpful, they train (RLHF) or e…

econ.GN2025

The AI Productivity Index (APEX)

Bertie Vidgen, Abby Fennelly, Evan Pinnix +17

We present an extended version of the AI Productivity Index (APEX-v1-extended), a benchmark for assessing whether frontier models are capable of performing economically valuable ta…

cs.CL2025

Classification is a RAG problem: A case study on hate speech detection

Richard Willats, Josh Pennington, Aravind Mohan +1

Robust content moderation requires classification systems that can quickly adapt to evolving policies without costly retraining. We present classification using Retrieval-Augmented…

cs.CY2025★ 4 cited

AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons

Shaona Ghosh, Heather Frase, Adina Williams +99

The rapid advancement and deployment of AI systems have created an urgent need for standard safety-evaluation frameworks. This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehen…

cs.HC2025★ 8 cited

Why human-AI relationships need socioaffective alignment

Hannah Rose Kirk, Iason Gabriel, Chris Summerfield +2

Humans strive to design safe AI systems that align with our goals and remain under our control. However, as AI capabilities advance, we face a new challenge: the emergence of deepe…

cs.CL2025

MSTS: A Multimodal Safety Test Suite for Vision-Language Models

Paul Röttger, Giuseppe Attanasio, Felix Friedrich +19

Vision-language models (VLMs), which process image and text inputs, are increasingly integrated into chat assistants and other consumer AI applications. Without proper safeguards,…

cs.CL2024

LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Tests

Jon Saad-Falcon, Rajan Vivek, William Berrios +6

As language models become integral to critical workflows, assessing their behavior remains a fundamental challenge -- human evaluation is costly and noisy, while automated metrics…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

The Responsible Foundation Model Development Cheatsheet: A Review of Tools & Resources

Shayne Longpre, Stella Biderman, Alon Albalak +20

Foundation model development attracts a rapidly expanding body of contributors, scientists, and applications. To help shape responsible development practices, we introduce the Foun…

cs.LG2024★ 8 cited

Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI

Francisco Eiras, Aleksandar Petrov, Bertie Vidgen +22

Applications of Generative AI (Gen AI) are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic chan…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI

Francisco Eiras, Aleksandar Petrov, Bertie Vidgen +21

In the next few years, applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for thes…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons

Bertie Vidgen, Adarsh Agrawal, Ahmed M. Ahmed +97

This paper introduces v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark, which has been created by the MLCommons AI Safety Working Group. The AI Safety Benchmark has been designed to assess the safe…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

WorkBench: a Benchmark Dataset for Agents in a Realistic Workplace Setting

Olly Styles, Sam Miller, Patricio Cerda-Mardini +3

We introduce WorkBench: a benchmark dataset for evaluating agents' ability to execute tasks in a workplace setting. WorkBench contains a sandbox environment with five databases, 26…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models

Hannah Rose Kirk, Alexander Whitefield, Paul Röttger +9

Human feedback is central to the alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, open questions remain about methods (how), domains (where), people (who) and objectives (to wha…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safety

Paul Röttger, Fabio Pernisi, Bertie Vidgen +1

The last two years have seen a rapid growth in concerns around the safety of large language models (LLMs). Researchers and practitioners have met these concerns by creating an abun…

cs.CL2023★ 11 cited

FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering

Pranab Islam, Anand Kannappan, Douwe Kiela +3

FinanceBench is a first-of-its-kind test suite for evaluating the performance of LLMs on open book financial question answering (QA). It comprises 10,231 questions about publicly t…

cs.CL2023★ 3 cited

The Empty Signifier Problem: Towards Clearer Paradigms for Operationalising "Alignment" in Large Language Models

Hannah Rose Kirk, Bertie Vidgen, Paul Röttger +1

In this paper, we address the concept of "alignment" in large language models (LLMs) through the lens of post-structuralist socio-political theory, specifically examining its paral…

cs.CL2023★ 5 cited

SimpleSafetyTests: a Test Suite for Identifying Critical Safety Risks in Large Language Models

Bertie Vidgen, Nino Scherrer, Hannah Rose Kirk +4

The past year has seen rapid acceleration in the development of large language models (LLMs). However, without proper steering and safeguards, LLMs will readily follow malicious in…

cs.CL2023

The Past, Present and Better Future of Feedback Learning in Large Language Models for Subjective Human Preferences and Values

Hannah Rose Kirk, Andrew M. Bean, Bertie Vidgen +2

Human feedback is increasingly used to steer the behaviours of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it is unclear how to collect and incorporate feedback in a way that is efficie…