works on

From the 1 of 11 linked papers with an AI index.

activity
20242026
collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

OOD-RL-Bench: A Benchmark Framework for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Reinforcement Learning

Emil Mittag, Richard Dazeley, Peter Vamplew

The paper introduces OOD-RL-Bench, a benchmark framework for evaluating out-of-distribution detection methods in reinforcement learning by injecting various anomalies into RL traje…

cs.LG2026

Memory Merge DQN: Sensitivity Weighted Target Updates for Stable Value Learning

Adrian Ly, Richard Dazeley, Peter Vamplew +2

Deep Q-networks use target networks to stabilise bootstrapped value learning, but the standard hard copy update also introduces a tradeoff. Holding the target network fixed, improv…

cs.LG2026

Ensemble Elastic DQN: A Step Dependent Ensemble Approach for Reducing Overestimation in Deep Value-Based Reinforcement Learning

Adrian Ly, Richard Dazeley, Peter Vamplew +2

Deep Q-Networks (DQN) can suffer from overestimation bias because bootstrapped targets use a maximisation operation over noisy value estimates. Ensemble-based methods and multi-ste…

cs.LG2026

Issues with Value-Based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning: Value Function Interference and Overestimation Sensitivity

Peter Vamplew, Ethan, Watkins +2

Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) algorithms extend conventional reinforcement learning (RL) to the more general case of problems with multiple, conflicting objectives,…

cs.LG2026

Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning With Augmented States Requires Rewards After Deployment

Peter Vamplew, Cameron Foale

This research note identifies a previously overlooked distinction between multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL), and more conventional single-objective reinforcement learni…

cs.LG2025

ES-C51: Expected Sarsa Based C51 Distributional Reinforcement Learning Algorithm

Rijul Tandon, Peter Vamplew, Cameron Foale

In most value-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, the agent estimates only the expected reward for each action and selects the action with the highest reward. In contrast…