activity
20182025
most citedFrom Who You Know to What You Read: Augmenting Scientific Recommendations with Implicit Social Networks

24 citations · 47 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

13 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025

Ai2 Scholar QA: Organized Literature Synthesis with Attribution

Amanpreet Singh, Joseph Chee Chang, Chloe Anastasiades +15

Retrieval-augmented generation is increasingly effective in answering scientific questions from literature, but many state-of-the-art systems are expensive and closed-source. We in…

cs.CL20246 cited

OpenScholar: Synthesizing Scientific Literature with Retrieval-augmented LMs

Akari Asai, Jacqueline He, Rulin Shao +22

Scientific progress depends on researchers' ability to synthesize the growing body of literature. Can large language models (LMs) assist scientists in this task? We introduce OpenS…

cs.CL2024

TOPICAL: TOPIC Pages AutomagicaLly

John Giorgi, Amanpreet Singh, Doug Downey +2

Topic pages aggregate useful information about an entity or concept into a single succinct and accessible article. Automated creation of topic pages would enable their rapid curati…

cs.CL20221 cited

Learning to Perform Complex Tasks through Compositional Fine-Tuning of Language Models

Victor S. Bursztyn, David Demeter, Doug Downey +1

How to usefully encode compositional task structure has long been a core challenge in AI. Recent work in chain of thought prompting has shown that for very large neural language mo…

cs.CL2022

ACCoRD: A Multi-Document Approach to Generating Diverse Descriptions of Scientific Concepts

Sonia K. Murthy, Kyle Lo, Daniel King +7

Systems that can automatically define unfamiliar terms hold the promise of improving the accessibility of scientific texts, especially for readers who may lack prerequisite backgro…

cs.CL2021

"It doesn't look good for a date": Transforming Critiques into Preferences for Conversational Recommendation Systems

Victor S. Bursztyn, Jennifer Healey, Nedim Lipka +3

Conversations aimed at determining good recommendations are iterative in nature. People often express their preferences in terms of a critique of the current recommendation (e.g.,…