activity
20192026
most citedSemi-Supervised Learning using Differentiable Reasoning

19 citations · 61 across the 15 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

18 papers

math.FA2026

Expansive operators on Fréchet spaces without continuous norm

Antoni López-Martínez, Quentin Menet

We investigate the existence of (metrically) expansive operators on Fréchet spaces without continuous norm. We first solve a problem posed by Bernardes, Caraballo, Darji, Fávaro, a…

cs.CL2026

Question-Specific Knowledge Graphs for Efficient Visual Reasoning

Ting-Chih Chen, Emile van Krieken, Shujian Yu +1

Recent work in visual question answering has shown that vision-language models can exhibit strong reasoning capabilities by translating visual inputs into textual representations.…

cs.AI2026

The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning

Agnese Chiatti, Michael Cochez, Cristina Cornelio +14

Neurosymbolic AI systems that integrate machine learning and symbolic reasoning are rapidly gaining attention. They complement the data-intensive statistical approaches of neural n…

cs.LG2025

Neurosymbolic Diffusion Models

Emile van Krieken, Pasquale Minervini, Edoardo Ponti +1

Neurosymbolic (NeSy) predictors combine neural perception with symbolic reasoning to solve tasks like visual reasoning. However, standard NeSy predictors assume conditional indepen…

cs.LG2024

A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark Suite for Concept Quality and Reasoning Shortcuts

Samuele Bortolotti, Emanuele Marconato, Tommaso Carraro +5

The advent of powerful neural classifiers has increased interest in problems that require both learning and reasoning. These problems are critical for understanding important prope…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Are We Done with MMLU?

Aryo Pradipta Gema, Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Giwon Hong +13

Maybe not. We identify and analyse errors in the popular Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark. Even though MMLU is widely adopted, our analysis demonstrates nu…

cs.AI2024

ULLER: A Unified Language for Learning and Reasoning

Emile van Krieken, Samy Badreddine, Robin Manhaeve +1

The field of neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence (NeSy), which combines learning and reasoning, has recently experienced significant growth. There now are a wide variety of NeSy…

stat.ML2024

On the Independence Assumption in Neurosymbolic Learning

Emile van Krieken, Pasquale Minervini, Edoardo M. Ponti +1

State-of-the-art neurosymbolic learning systems use probabilistic reasoning to guide neural networks towards predictions that conform to logical constraints over symbols. Many such…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcuts

Emanuele Marconato, Samuele Bortolotti, Emile van Krieken +3

Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictors that conform to symbolic knowledge - encoding, e.g., safety constraints - can be affected by Reasoning Shortcuts (RSs): They learn concepts consist…

cs.AI2024★ 3 cited

Optimisation in Neurosymbolic Learning Systems

Emile van Krieken

Neurosymbolic AI aims to integrate deep learning with symbolic AI. This integration has many promises, such as decreasing the amount of data required to train a neural network, imp…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

GRAPES: Learning to Sample Graphs for Scalable Graph Neural Networks

Taraneh Younesian, Daniel Daza, Emile van Krieken +2

Graph neural networks (GNNs) learn to represent nodes by aggregating information from their neighbors. As GNNs increase in depth, their receptive field grows exponentially, leading…

cs.AI2023★ 1 cited

IntelliGraphs: Datasets for Benchmarking Knowledge Graph Generation

Thiviyan Thanapalasingam, Emile van Krieken, Peter Bloem +1

Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) models are used to learn continuous representations of entities and relations. A key task in the literature is predicting missing links between enti…

cs.CL2022★ 14 cited

Prompting as Probing: Using Language Models for Knowledge Base Construction

Dimitrios Alivanistos, Selene Báez Santamaría, Michael Cochez +3

Language Models (LMs) have proven to be useful in various downstream applications, such as summarisation, translation, question answering and text classification. LMs are becoming…

cs.AI2022

Refining neural network predictions using background knowledge

Alessandro Daniele, Emile van Krieken, Luciano Serafini +1

Recent work has shown logical background knowledge can be used in learning systems to compensate for a lack of labeled training data. Many methods work by creating a loss function…

stat.ML2021★ 8 cited

Storchastic: A Framework for General Stochastic Automatic Differentiation

Emile van Krieken, Jakub M. Tomczak, Annette ten Teije

Modelers use automatic differentiation (AD) of computation graphs to implement complex Deep Learning models without defining gradient computations. Stochastic AD extends AD to stoc…

cs.AI2020

Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Implications

Emile van Krieken, Erman Acar, Frank van Harmelen

Combining symbolic and neural approaches has gained considerable attention in the AI community, as it is often argued that the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches are comp…

cs.AI2020★ 12 cited

Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Logic Operators

Emile van Krieken, Erman Acar, Frank van Harmelen

The AI community is increasingly putting its attention towards combining symbolic and neural approaches, as it is often argued that the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches…

cs.AI2019★ 19 cited

Semi-Supervised Learning using Differentiable Reasoning

Emile van Krieken, Erman Acar, Frank van Harmelen

We introduce Differentiable Reasoning (DR), a novel semi-supervised learning technique which uses relational background knowledge to benefit from unlabeled data. We apply it to the…