activity
20182026
most citedExtracting Training Data from Large Language Models

273 citations · 1.4k across the 55 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

60 papers

cs.AI2026

Automating ML for Science: Can Frontier Agents Climb Scientific Hills in the Wild?

Ming Zhong, Stacy Li, Nicholas Carlini +1

Frontier coding agents are increasingly framed as end-to-end automated researchers, and ML for science offers a demanding test of that promise: improving a scientific model often r…

cs.LG2026

Pick Your Poison: Learning to Select Poison Sets for Stronger LLM Backdoor Attacks

Aashiq Muhamed, Mona T. Diab, Virginia Smith +2

Backdoor poisoning attacks add poisoned examples to otherwise-clean finetuning data, pairing a trigger with a target behavior that the model learns to produce when the trigger appe…

cs.CR2026

CryptanalysisBench: Can LLMs do Cryptanalysis?

Lukas Fluri, Avital Shafran, Nicholas Carlini +5

Cryptanalysis - the task of finding attacks against cryptographic schemes - sits at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and cybersecurity, two areas where LLMs have advanced…

cs.CY2026

The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities

Stephen Casper, Oskar Galeev, Yoshua Bengio +117

Frontier AI capabilities and autonomy are advancing rapidly. A growing number of real-world incidents make a trusted AI ecosystem essential to embracing AI with confidence. The 202…

cs.CR2026

Untrusted Content Masking for Web Agents with Security Guarantees

Kristina Nikolić, Egor Zverev, Javier Rando +3

Defenses that provide security guarantees against prompt injection attacks rely on strict isolation between trusted instructions and untrusted data. In text-based environments such…

cs.LG2026

TabPATE: Differentially Private Tabular In-Context Learning Without Public Data

Dariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Jesse C. Cresswell +2

Tabular foundation models enable accurate in-context learning (ICL) from small labeled datasets, but the private records placed in context can leak through model predictions. We fi…

cs.LG2026

Curation Leaks: Membership Inference Attacks against Data Curation for Machine Learning

Dariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic +1

In machine learning, curation is used to select the most valuable data for improving both model accuracy and computational efficiency. Recently, curation has also been explored as…

cs.CR2026

Thought-Transfer: Indirect Targeted Poisoning Attacks on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Models

Harsh Chaudhari, Ethan Rathbun, Hanna Foerster +5

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing large language models' capabilities by generating intermediate reasoning steps for complex tasks.…

cs.AI2025

Extracting alignment data in open models

Federico Barbero, Xiangming Gu, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo +6

In this work, we show that it is possible to extract significant amounts of alignment training data from a post-trained model -- useful to steer the model to improve certain capabi…

cs.LG2025★ 1 cited

SoK: Data Minimization in Machine Learning

Robin Staab, Nikola Jovanović, Kimberly Mai +4

Data minimization (DM) describes the principle of collecting only the data strictly necessary for a given task. It is a foundational principle across major data protection regulati…

cs.LG2025

Black-Box Privacy Attacks on Shared Representations in Multitask Learning

John Abascal, Nicolás Berrios, Alina Oprea +3

Multitask learning (MTL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm that leverages similarities among multiple learning tasks, each with insufficient samples to train a standalone model, t…

cs.CR2025

Covert Attacks on Machine Learning Training in Passively Secure MPC

Matthew Jagielski, Daniel Escudero, Rahul Rachuri +1

Secure multiparty computation (MPC) allows data owners to train machine learning models on combined data while keeping the underlying training data private. The MPC threat model ei…

cs.CR2025

LLMs unlock new paths to monetizing exploits

Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Edoardo Debenedetti +5

We argue that Large language models (LLMs) will soon alter the economics of cyberattacks. Instead of attacking the most commonly used software and monetizing exploits by targeting…

cs.LG2025

Cascading Adversarial Bias from Injection to Distillation in Language Models

Harsh Chaudhari, Jamie Hayes, Matthew Jagielski +3

Model distillation has become essential for creating smaller, deployable language models that retain larger system capabilities. However, widespread deployment raises concerns abou…

cs.CR2025

Exploring the limits of strong membership inference attacks on large language models

Jamie Hayes, Ilia Shumailov, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo +13

State-of-the-art membership inference attacks (MIAs) typically require training many reference models, making it difficult to scale these attacks to large pre-trained language mode…

cs.CL2025

Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained On

Ken Ziyu Liu, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Matthew Jagielski +4

An important question today is whether a given text was used to train a large language model (LLM). A \emph{completion} test is often employed: check if the LLM completes a suffici…

cs.CL2025

Privacy Ripple Effects from Adding or Removing Personal Information in Language Model Training

Jaydeep Borkar, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee +3

Due to the sensitive nature of personally identifiable information (PII), its owners may have the authority to control its inclusion or request its removal from large-language mode…

cs.LG2025

Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboards

Yangsibo Huang, Milad Nasr, Anastasios Angelopoulos +10

It is now common to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) by having humans manually vote to evaluate model outputs, in contrast to typical benchmarks that evaluate knowledge or ski…

cs.CR2024

On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs

Xiangyu Qi, Boyi Wei, Nicholas Carlini +7

Stakeholders -- from model developers to policymakers -- seek to minimize the dual-use risks of large language models (LLMs). An open challenge to this goal is whether technical sa…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Machine Unlearning Doesn't Do What You Think: Lessons for Generative AI Policy and Research

A. Feder Cooper, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Miranda Bogen +34

"Machine unlearning" is a popular proposed solution for mitigating the existence of content in an AI model that is problematic for legal or moral reasons, including privacy, copyri…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

The Last Iterate Advantage: Empirical Auditing and Principled Heuristic Analysis of Differentially Private SGD

Thomas Steinke, Milad Nasr, Arun Ganesh +7

We propose a simple heuristic privacy analysis of noisy clipped stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) in the setting where only the last iterate is released and the intermediate ite…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

UnUnlearning: Unlearning is not sufficient for content regulation in advanced generative AI

Ilia Shumailov, Jamie Hayes, Eleni Triantafillou +6

Exact unlearning was first introduced as a privacy mechanism that allowed a user to retract their data from machine learning models on request. Shortly after, inexact schemes were…

cs.LG2024

Differentially Private Prototypes for Imbalanced Transfer Learning

Dariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic +1

Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to leak private information from their training datasets. Differential Privacy (DP), typically implemented through the differential pri…

cs.CR2024★ 3 cited

Phantom: General Backdoor Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation

Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal +6

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs), by anchoring, adapting, and personalizing their responses to the most relevant…