activity
20132026
most citedCounterfactual Fairness

841 citations · 1.1k across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

17 papers

cs.CY2026

Bridging Predictions and Interventions: An Integrated Framework for Automated Decision-Systems

Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Lydia T. Liu, Angela Zhou +27

Automated decision systems (ADS) leverage predictions about individual future outcomes to inform consequential decision-making in organizational settings. Across various settings -…

cs.LG2025

Bridging Prediction and Intervention Problems in Social Systems

Lydia T. Liu, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Angela Zhou +32

Many automated decision systems (ADS) are designed to solve prediction problems -- where the goal is to learn patterns from a sample of the population and apply them to individuals…

stat.ML2025

Counterfactually Fair Reinforcement Learning via Sequential Data Preprocessing

Jitao Wang, Chengchun Shi, John D. Piette +3

When applied in healthcare, reinforcement learning (RL) seeks to dynamically match the right interventions to subjects to maximize population benefit. However, the learned policy m…

cs.CY2024

Position: The Causal Revolution Needs Scientific Pragmatism

Joshua Loftus

Causal models and methods have great promise, but their progress has been stalled. Proposals using causality get squeezed between two opposing worldviews. Scientific perfectionism-…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

A New Paradigm for Counterfactual Reasoning in Fairness and Recourse

Lucius E. J. Bynum, Joshua R. Loftus, Julia Stoyanovich

Counterfactuals and counterfactual reasoning underpin numerous techniques for auditing and understanding artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The traditional paradigm for counterf…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Causal Dependence Plots

Joshua R. Loftus, Lucius E. J. Bynum, Sakina Hansen

Explaining artificial intelligence or machine learning models is increasingly important. To use such data-driven systems wisely we must understand how they interact with the world,…

cs.AI2022

Counterfactuals for the Future

Lucius E. J. Bynum, Joshua R. Loftus, Julia Stoyanovich

Counterfactuals are often described as 'retrospective,' focusing on hypothetical alternatives to a realized past. This description relates to an often implicit assumption about the…

cs.LG2021★ 6 cited

Disaggregated Interventions to Reduce Inequality

Lucius E. J. Bynum, Joshua R. Loftus, Julia Stoyanovich

A significant body of research in the data sciences considers unfair discrimination against social categories such as race or gender that could occur or be amplified as a result of…

cs.LG2020

Causal intersectionality for fair ranking

Ke Yang, Joshua R. Loftus, Julia Stoyanovich

In this paper we propose a causal modeling approach to intersectional fairness, and a flexible, task-specific method for computing intersectionally fair rankings. Rankings are used…

stat.ML2018★ 12 cited

Causal Interventions for Fairness

Matt J. Kusner, Chris Russell, Joshua R. Loftus +1

Most approaches in algorithmic fairness constrain machine learning methods so the resulting predictions satisfy one of several intuitive notions of fairness. While this may help pr…

cs.AI2018★ 77 cited

Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairness

Joshua R. Loftus, Chris Russell, Matt J. Kusner +1

In this work, we argue for the importance of causal reasoning in creating fair algorithms for decision making. We give a review of existing approaches to fairness, describe work in…

stat.ML2017★ 841 cited

Counterfactual Fairness

Matt J. Kusner, Joshua R. Loftus, Chris Russell +1

Machine learning can impact people with legal or ethical consequences when it is used to automate decisions in areas such as insurance, lending, hiring, and predictive policing. In…

stat.ME2015★ 18 cited

Selective inference after cross-validation

Joshua R. Loftus

This paper describes a method for performing inference on models chosen by cross-validation. When the test error being minimized in cross-validation is a residual sum of squares it…

stat.ME2015★ 26 cited

Selective inference in regression models with groups of variables

Joshua R. Loftus, Jonathan E. Taylor

We provide a general mathematical framework for selective inference with supervised model selection procedures characterized by quadratic forms in the outcome variable. Forward ste…

math.ST2015★ 17 cited

Selective inference with unknown variance via the square-root LASSO

Xiaoying Tian, Joshua R. Loftus, Jonathan E. Taylor

There has been much recent work on inference after model selection when the noise level is known, however, is rarely known in practice and its estimation is difficult in high-d…

stat.ME2014★ 36 cited

A significance test for forward stepwise model selection

Joshua R. Loftus, Jonathan E. Taylor

We apply the methods developed by Lockhart et al. (2013) and Taylor et al. (2013) on significance tests for penalized regression to forward stepwise model selection. A general fram…

stat.ME2013★ 15 cited

Tests in adaptive regression via the Kac-Rice formula

Jonathan Taylor, Joshua Loftus, Ryan Tibshirani

We derive an exact p-value for testing a global null hypothesis in a general adaptive regression problem. The general approach uses the Kac-Rice formula, as described in (Adler & T…