661 citations · 4.4k across the 46 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers · 1 filter
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Deep Field Optical + Near-Infrared Images and Catalogue
W. G. Hartley, A. Choi, A. Amon +115
We describe the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Deep Fields, a set of images and associated multi-wavelength catalogue () built from Dark Energy Camera (DECam) and Visible and…
DES Y3 results: Blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations
N. MacCrann, M. R. Becker, J. McCullough +93
As the statistical power of galaxy weak lensing reaches percent level precision, large, realistic and robust simulations are required to calibrate observational systematics, especi…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
J. Myles, A. Alarcon, A. Amon +105
Determining the distribution of redshifts of galaxies observed by wide-field photometric experiments like the Dark Energy Survey is an essential component to mapping the matter den…
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe
Hung-Jin Huang, Tim Eifler, Rachel Mandelbaum +74
Measurements of large-scale structure are interpreted using theoretical predictions for the matter distribution, including potential impacts of baryonic physics. We constrain the f…
Masses: Weak Lensing Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 redMaPPer Clusters using Stellar Masses
M. E. S. Pereira, A. Palmese, T. N. Varga +78
We present the weak lensing mass calibration of the stellar mass based mass proxy for redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1. For the first time we…
Propagating sample variance uncertainties in redshift calibration: simulations, theory and application to the COSMOS2015 data
Carles Sánchez, Marco Raveri, Alex Alarcon +1
Cosmological analyses of galaxy surveys rely on knowledge of the redshift distribution of their galaxy sample. This is usually derived from a spectroscopic and/or many-band photome…