activity
20202026
most citedOn my favorite conventions for drawing the missing diagrams in Category Theory

2 citations · 6 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

math.HO2026

Bad Foundations and Manipulable Objects

Eduardo Ochs

Imagine a student -- let's call him `E', and make him a "he" -- that is enrolled in Calculus 2, and who believes that to pass in maths courses he only needs to memorize methods and…

math.CT2022★ 2 cited

On the the missing diagrams in Category Theory (first-person version)

Eduardo Ochs

Most texts on Category Theory are written in a very terse style, in which people pretend a) that all concepts are visualizable, and b) that the readers can reconstruct the diagrams…

math.CT2021

Each closure operator induces a topology and vice-versa ("version for children")

Eduardo Ochs

One of the main prerequisites for understanding sheaves on elementary toposes is the proof that a (Lawvere-Tierney) topology on a topos induces a closure operator on it, and vice-v…

math.CO2021★ 1 cited

On a formula that is not in "Grothendieck Topologies in Posets"

Eduardo Ochs

The paper "Grothendieck Topologies on Posets" by A.J. Lindenhovius shows that when is an Artinian poset and is the topos then th…

math.CT2020★ 2 cited

On my favorite conventions for drawing the missing diagrams in Category Theory

Eduardo Ochs

I used to believe that my conventions for drawing diagrams for categorical statements could be written down in one page or less, and that the only tricky part was the technique for…

math.CT2020★ 1 cited

Planar Heyting Algebras for Children 2: Local Operators, J-Operators, and Slashings

Eduardo Ochs

Choose a topos . There are several different "notions of sheafness" on . How do we visualize them? Let's refer to the classifier object of as , and to its Heyting Alge…