2 citations · 4 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
ConfoundingSHAP: Quantifying confounding strength in causal inference
Marie Brockschmidt, Santo M. A. R. Thies, Maresa Schröder +5
In causal inference, confounders are variables that influence both treatment decisions and outcomes. However, unlike as in randomized clinical trials, the treatment assignment mech…
Position: agentic AI orchestration should be Bayes-consistent
Theodore Papamarkou, Pierre Alquier, Matthias Bauer +27
LLMs excel at predictive tasks and complex reasoning tasks, but many high-value deployments rely on decisions under uncertainty, for example, which tool to call, which expert to co…
Structured Credal Learning
Varun Venkatesh, Eyke Hüllermeier, Bernd Bischl +1
Real-world learning tasks often encounter uncertainty due to covariate shift and noisy or inconsistent labels. However, existing robust learning methods merge these effects into a…
Quantification of Credal Uncertainty: A Distance-Based Approach
Xabier Gonzalez-Garcia, Siu Lun Chau, Julian Rodemann +6
Credal sets, i.e., closed convex sets of probability measures, provide a natural framework to represent aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning. Yet how to quantify…
Evolutionary Mapping of Neural Networks to Spatial Accelerators
Alessandro Pierro, Jonathan Timcheck, Jason Yik +3
Spatial accelerators, composed of arrays of compute-memory integrated units, offer an attractive platform for deploying inference workloads with low latency and low energy consumpt…