activity
20202026
most citedOut of the BLEU: how should we assess quality of the Code Generation models?

115 citations · 386 across the 61 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

70 papers

cs.LG2026

Don't Claim Benchmark-Oriented Optimization Improves General Coding Capability -- Diverse Evaluation Is Required

Egor Shibaev, Vera Kudrevskaia, Timur Galimzyanov +9

Post-training papers, model cards, and blog posts often treat scores on a small set of coding benchmarks (e.g., SWE-bench and LiveCodeBench) as evidence of broad coding capability,…

cs.SE2026

Multi-Agent Coordinated Rename Refactoring

Abhiram Bellur, Mohammed Raihan Ullah, Fraol Batole +9

The primary value of AI agents in software development lies in their ability to extend the developer's capacity for reasoning and action, not to supplant human involvement. To show…

cs.SE2025★ 1 cited

Observing Fine-Grained Changes in Jupyter Notebooks During Development Time

Sergey Titov, Konstantin Grotov, Cristina Sarasua +5

In software engineering research, the analysis of fine-grained logs led to significant innovations in areas such as refactoring, security, and code completion. However, even though…

cs.SE2025★ 1 cited

Leveraging LLMs, IDEs, and Semantic Embeddings for Automated Move Method Refactoring

Abhiram Bellur, Fraol Batole, Mohammed Raihan Ullah +12

MOVEMETHOD is a hallmark refactoring. Despite a plethora of research tools that recommend which methods to move and where, these recommendations do not align with how expert develo…

cs.SE2025

In-IDE Programming Courses: Learning Software Development in a Real-World Setting

Anastasiia Birillo, Ilya Vlasov, Katsiaryna Dzialets +2

While learning programming languages is crucial for software engineers, mastering the necessary tools is equally important. To facilitate this, JetBrains recently released the JetB…

cs.LG2024

Debug Smarter, Not Harder: AI Agents for Error Resolution in Computational Notebooks

Konstantin Grotov, Artem Borzilov, Maksim Krivobok +2

Computational notebooks became indispensable tools for research-related development, offering unprecedented interactivity and flexibility in the development process. However, these…

cs.SE2024★ 16 cited

One Step at a Time: Combining LLMs and Static Analysis to Generate Next-Step Hints for Programming Tasks

Anastasiia Birillo, Elizaveta Artser, Anna Potriasaeva +6

Students often struggle with solving programming problems when learning to code, especially when they have to do it online, with one of the most common disadvantages of working onl…

cs.SE2024

Towards Realistic Evaluation of Commit Message Generation by Matching Online and Offline Settings

Petr Tsvetkov, Aleksandra Eliseeva, Danny Dig +4

When a Commit Message Generation (CMG) system is integrated into the IDEs and other products at JetBrains, we perform online evaluation based on user acceptance of the generated me…

cs.SE2024★ 3 cited

Developer Needs and Feasible Features for AI Assistants in IDEs

Agnia Sergeyuk, Ekaterina Koshchenko, Ilya Zakharov +2

Despite the increasing presence of AI assistants in Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), it remains unclear what different groups of developers actually need from these tool…

cs.SE2024

Assessing Consensus of Developers' Views on Code Readability

Agnia Sergeyuk, Olga Lvova, Sergey Titov +3

The rapid rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has changed software development, with tools like Copilot, JetBrains AI Assistant, and others boosting developers' productivity. Howe…

cs.LG2024★ 6 cited

Long Code Arena: a Set of Benchmarks for Long-Context Code Models

Egor Bogomolov, Aleksandra Eliseeva, Timur Galimzyanov +8

Nowadays, the fields of code and natural language processing are evolving rapidly. In particular, models become better at processing long context windows - supported context sizes…

cs.SE2024

On The Importance of Reasoning for Context Retrieval in Repository-Level Code Editing

Alexander Kovrigin, Aleksandra Eliseeva, Yaroslav Zharov +1

Recent advancements in code-fluent Large Language Models (LLMs) enabled the research on repository-level code editing. In such tasks, the model navigates and modifies the entire co…

cs.SE2024★ 88 cited

Using AI-Based Coding Assistants in Practice: State of Affairs, Perceptions, and Ways Forward

Agnia Sergeyuk, Yaroslav Golubev, Timofey Bryksin +1

Context. The last several years saw the emergence of AI assistants for code - multi-purpose AI-based helpers in software engineering. As they become omnipresent in all aspects of s…

cs.SE2024★ 56 cited

EM-Assist: Safe Automated ExtractMethod Refactoring with LLMs

Dorin Pomian, Abhiram Bellur, Malinda Dilhara +5

Excessively long methods, loaded with multiple responsibilities, are challenging to understand, debug, reuse, and maintain. The solution lies in the widely recognized Extract Metho…

cs.SE2024

Kotlin ML Pack: Technical Report

Sergey Titov, Mikhail Evtikhiev, Anton Shapkin +7

In this technical report, we present three novel datasets of Kotlin code: KStack, KStack-clean, and KExercises. We also describe the results of fine-tuning CodeLlama and DeepSeek m…

cs.SE2024★ 2 cited

Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop

Anton Semenkin, Vitaliy Bibaev, Yaroslav Sokolov +14

In recent years, several industrial solutions for the problem of multi-token code completion appeared, each making a great advance in the area but mostly focusing on cloud-based ru…

cs.SE2024

Untangling Knots: Leveraging LLM for Error Resolution in Computational Notebooks

Konstantin Grotov, Sergey Titov, Yaroslav Zharov +1

Computational notebooks became indispensable tools for research-related development, offering unprecedented interactivity and flexibility in the development process. However, these…

cs.SE2024★ 3 cited

Clustering MOOC Programming Solutions to Diversify Their Presentation to Students

Elizaveta Artser, Anastasiia Birillo, Yaroslav Golubev +4

In many MOOCs, whenever a student completes a programming task, they can see previous solutions of other students to find potentially different ways of solving the problem and to l…

cs.SE2024★ 23 cited

Unprecedented Code Change Automation: The Fusion of LLMs and Transformation by Example

Malinda Dilhara, Abhiram Bellur, Timofey Bryksin +1

Software developers often repeat code changes, known as "code change patterns" (CPATs), within and across projects. Automating these CPATs accelerates development, but current Tran…

cs.SE2024

Reassessing Java Code Readability Models with a Human-Centered Approach

Agnia Sergeyuk, Olga Lvova, Sergey Titov +4

To ensure that Large Language Models (LLMs) effectively support user productivity, they need to be adjusted. Existing Code Readability (CR) models can guide this alignment. However…

cs.SE2024★ 2 cited

Together We Go Further: LLMs and IDE Static Analysis for Extract Method Refactoring

Dorin Pomian, Abhiram Bellur, Malinda Dilhara +4

Long methods that encapsulate multiple responsibilities within a single method are challenging to maintain. Choosing which statements to extract into new methods has been the targe…

cs.SE2023★ 2 cited

Dynamic Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Anton Shapkin, Denis Litvinov, Yaroslav Zharov +3

Current state-of-the-art large language models are effective in generating high-quality text and encapsulating a broad spectrum of world knowledge. These models, however, often hal…

cs.SE2023★ 1 cited

From Commit Message Generation to History-Aware Commit Message Completion

Aleksandra Eliseeva, Yaroslav Sokolov, Egor Bogomolov +3

Commit messages are crucial to software development, allowing developers to track changes and collaborate effectively. Despite their utility, most commit messages lack important in…

cs.SE2023★ 1 cited

Overcoming the Mental Set Effect in Programming Problem Solving

Agnia Sergeyuk, Sergey Titov, Yaroslav Golubev +1

This paper adopts a cognitive psychology perspective to investigate the recurring mistakes in code resulting from the mental set (Einstellung) effect. The Einstellung effect is the…