activity
20202026
most citedTowards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summary

11 citations · 40 across the 14 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

14 papers

cs.LG2026

CollabEval: Statistically Efficient Collaborative Model Evaluation via Matrix Completion

Adam Fisch, Daniel Deutsch, Joshua Maynez +5

Evaluating generative AI models is a routine, but resource-intensive, process that is conducted over and over again during the course of model development. In this work, we propose…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Training and Meta-Evaluating Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics at the Paragraph Level

Daniel Deutsch, Juraj Juraska, Mara Finkelstein +1

As research on machine translation moves to translating text beyond the sentence level, it remains unclear how effective automatic evaluation metrics are at scoring longer translat…

cs.CL2023★ 5 cited

The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluation

Patrick Fernandes, Daniel Deutsch, Mara Finkelstein +7

Automatic evaluation of machine translation (MT) is a critical tool driving the rapid iterative development of MT systems. While considerable progress has been made on estimating a…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

Needle in a Haystack: An Analysis of High-Agreement Workers on MTurk for Summarization

Lining Zhang, Simon Mille, Yufang Hou +8

To prevent the costly and inefficient use of resources on low-quality annotations, we want a method for creating a pool of dependable annotators who can effectively complete diffic…

cs.CL2022★ 2 cited

On the Limitations of Reference-Free Evaluations of Generated Text

Daniel Deutsch, Rotem Dror, Dan Roth

There is significant interest in developing evaluation metrics which accurately estimate the quality of generated text without the aid of a human-written reference text, which can…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Code

Sebastian Gehrmann, Abhik Bhattacharjee, Abinaya Mahendiran +74

Evaluation in machine learning is usually informed by past choices, for example which datasets or metrics to use. This standardization enables the comparison on equal footing using…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

Repro: An Open-Source Library for Improving the Reproducibility and Usability of Publicly Available Research Code

Daniel Deutsch, Dan Roth

We introduce Repro, an open-source library which aims at improving the reproducibility and usability of research code. The library provides a lightweight Python API for running sof…

cs.CL2022★ 2 cited

Re-Examining System-Level Correlations of Automatic Summarization Evaluation Metrics

Daniel Deutsch, Rotem Dror, Dan Roth

How reliably an automatic summarization evaluation metric replicates human judgments of summary quality is quantified by system-level correlations. We identify two ways in which th…

cs.CL2022

Benchmarking Answer Verification Methods for Question Answering-Based Summarization Evaluation Metrics

Daniel Deutsch, Dan Roth

Question answering-based summarization evaluation metrics must automatically determine whether the QA model's prediction is correct or not, a task known as answer verification. In…

cs.CL2021★ 3 cited

Incorporating Question Answering-Based Signals into Abstractive Summarization via Salient Span Selection

Daniel Deutsch, Dan Roth

In this work, we propose a method for incorporating question-answering (QA) signals into a summarization model. Our method identifies salient noun phrases (NPs) in the input docume…

cs.CL2021★ 5 cited

A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methods

Daniel Deutsch, Rotem Dror, Dan Roth

The quality of a summarization evaluation metric is quantified by calculating the correlation between its scores and human annotations across a large number of summaries. Currently…

cs.CL2020★ 6 cited

Understanding the Extent to which Summarization Evaluation Metrics Measure the Information Quality of Summaries

Daniel Deutsch, Dan Roth

Reference-based metrics such as ROUGE or BERTScore evaluate the content quality of a summary by comparing the summary to a reference. Ideally, this comparison should measure the su…

cs.CL2020★ 11 cited

Towards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summary

Daniel Deutsch, Tania Bedrax-Weiss, Dan Roth

A desirable property of a reference-based evaluation metric that measures the content quality of a summary is that it should estimate how much information that summary has in commo…

cs.CL2020

SacreROUGE: An Open-Source Library for Using and Developing Summarization Evaluation Metrics

Daniel Deutsch, Dan Roth

We present SacreROUGE, an open-source library for using and developing summarization evaluation metrics. SacreROUGE removes many obstacles that researchers face when using or devel…