activity
20132020
most citedTrade-offs in School Choice: Comparing Deferred Acceptance, the Naive and the Classic Boston Mechanism

9 citations · 17 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

7 papers

cs.GT2020

An Axiomatic Decomposition of Strategyproofness for Ordinal Mechanism with Indifferences

Timo Mennle, Sven Seuken

We study mechanism which operate on ordinal preference information (i.e., rank ordered lists of alternatives) on the full domain of weak preferences that admits indifferences. We p…

cs.GT2020★ 3 cited

Two New Impossibility Results for the Random Assignment Problem

Timo Mennle, Sven Seuken

In this note, we prove two new impossibility results for random assignment mechanisms: Bogomolnaia and Moulin (2001) showed that no assignment mechanism can satisfy strategyproofne…

cs.GT2020

Local Sufficiency for Partial Strategyproofness

Timo Mennle, Sven Seuken

In (Mennle and Seuken, 2017), we have introduced partial strategyproofness, a new, relaxed notion of strategyproofness, to study the incentive properties of non-strategyproof assig…

cs.GT2015

The Pareto Frontier for Random Mechanisms

Timo Mennle, Sven Seuken

We study the trade-offs between strategyproofness and other desiderata, such as efficiency or fairness, that often arise in the design of random ordinal mechanisms. We use approxim…

cs.GT2014★ 9 cited

Trade-offs in School Choice: Comparing Deferred Acceptance, the Naive and the Classic Boston Mechanism

Timo Mennle, Sven Seuken

The three most common school choice mechanisms are the Deferred Acceptance mechanism (DA), the classic Boston mechanism (BM), and a variant of the Boston mechanism where students a…

cs.GT2014

Partial Strategyproofness: Relaxing Strategyproofness for the Random Assignment Problem

Timo Mennle, Sven Seuken

We present partial strategyproofness, a new, relaxed notion of strategyproofness for studying the incentive properties of non-strategyproof assignment mechanisms. Informally, a mec…