activity
20172026
most citedExplanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blame

144 citations · 335 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2024★ 13 cited

The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning

Nathaniel Li, Alexander Pan, Anjali Gopal +54

The White House Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence highlights the risks of large language models (LLMs) empowering malicious actors in developing biological, cyber, and che…

cs.LG2023★ 65 cited

Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency

Andy Zou, Long Phan, Sarah Chen +18

In this paper, we identify and characterize the emerging area of representation engineering (RepE), an approach to enhancing the transparency of AI systems that draws on insights f…

cs.LG2022

Diffeomorphic Counterfactuals with Generative Models

Ann-Kathrin Dombrowski, Jan E. Gerken, Klaus-Robert Müller +1

Counterfactuals can explain classification decisions of neural networks in a human interpretable way. We propose a simple but effective method to generate such counterfactuals. Mor…

cs.LG2020★ 4 cited

Towards Robust Explanations for Deep Neural Networks

Ann-Kathrin Dombrowski, Christopher J. Anders, Klaus-Robert Müller +1

Explanation methods shed light on the decision process of black-box classifiers such as deep neural networks. But their usefulness can be compromised because they are susceptible t…

cs.LG2020★ 35 cited

Fairwashing Explanations with Off-Manifold Detergent

Christopher J. Anders, Plamen Pasliev, Ann-Kathrin Dombrowski +2

Explanation methods promise to make black-box classifiers more transparent. As a result, it is hoped that they can act as proof for a sensible, fair and trustworthy decision-making…