activity
20192026
most citedConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Models

27 citations · 69 across the 35 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CV2024

Adaptive Video Understanding Agent: Enhancing efficiency with dynamic frame sampling and feedback-driven reasoning

Sullam Jeoung, Goeric Huybrechts, Bhavana Ganesh +2

Understanding long-form video content presents significant challenges due to its temporal complexity and the substantial computational resources required. In this work, we propose…

cs.LG2024

SeRA: Self-Reviewing and Alignment of Large Language Models using Implicit Reward Margins

Jongwoo Ko, Saket Dingliwal, Bhavana Ganesh +3

Direct alignment algorithms (DAAs), such as direct preference optimization (DPO), have become popular alternatives for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) due to thei…

cs.HC2024

Beyond correlation: The Impact of Human Uncertainty in Measuring the Effectiveness of Automatic Evaluation and LLM-as-a-Judge

Aparna Elangovan, Lei Xu, Jongwoo Ko +4

The effectiveness of automatic evaluation of generative models is typically measured by comparing the labels generated via automation with labels by humans using correlation metric…

cs.AI2024★ 2 cited

Exposing Privacy Gaps: Membership Inference Attack on Preference Data for LLM Alignment

Qizhang Feng, Siva Rajesh Kasa, Santhosh Kumar Kasa +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen widespread adoption due to their remarkable natural language capabilities. However, when deploying them in real-world settings, it is importa…

cs.CL2024★ 27 cited

ConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Models

Aparna Elangovan, Ling Liu, Lei Xu +2

In this position paper, we argue that human evaluation of generative large language models (LLMs) should be a multidisciplinary undertaking that draws upon insights from discipline…