14 citations · 16 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers · 1 filter
Can Machine Learning Support the Selection of Studies for Systematic Literature Review Updates?
Marcelo Costalonga, Bianca Minetto Napoleão, Maria Teresa Baldassarre +3
[Background] Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are essential for synthesizing evidence in Software Engineering (SE), but keeping them up-to-date requires substantial effort. Stu…
Towards Continuous Systematic Literature Review in Software Engineering
Bianca Minetto Napoleão, Fabio Petrillo, Sylvain Hallé +1
Context: New scientific evidence continuously arises with advances in Software Engineering (SE) research. Conventionally, Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are not updated or up…
Continuous Systematic Literature Review: An Approach for Open Science
Bianca Minetto Napoleão, Fabio Petrillo, Sylvain Hallé
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) play an important role in the Evidence-Based Software Engineering scenario. With the advance of the computer science field and the growth of re…
Open Source Software Development Process: A Systematic Review
Bianca Minetto Napoleão, Fabio Petrillo, Sylvain Hallé
Open Source Software (OSS) has been recognized by the software development community as an effective way to deliver software. Unlike traditional software development, OSS developme…
A Tertiary and Secondary Study Canvas
Bianca Minetto Napoleão, Fabio Petrillo, Sylvain Hallé
Over the past years, more secondary (Systematic Literature Reviews and Systematic Mappings) and tertiary studies have been conducted. Their conduction is considered a quite large t…
Establishing a Search String to Detect Secondary Studies in Software Engineering
Bianca Minetto Napoleao, Katia Romero Felizardo, Erica Ferreira de Souza +4
Context: A tertiary study can be performed to identify related reviews on a topic of interest. However, the elaboration of an appropriate and effective search string to detect seco…