activity
20202022
most citedOn Explaining Confounding Bias

2 citations · 3 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

7 papers

cs.DB20222 cited

On Explaining Confounding Bias

Brit Youngmann, Michael Cafarella, Yuval Moskovitch +1

When analyzing large datasets, analysts are often interested in the explanations for surprising or unexpected results produced by their queries. In this work, we focus on aggregate…

cs.DB2021

On Optimizing the Trade-off between Privacy and Utility in Data Provenance

Daniel Deutch, Ariel Frankenthal, Amir Gilad +1

Organizations that collect and analyze data may wish or be mandated by regulation to justify and explain their analysis results. At the same time, the logic that they have followed…

cs.DB2020

Patterns Count-Based Labels for Datasets

Yuval Moskovitch, H. V. Jagadish

Counts of attribute-value combinations are central to the profiling of a dataset, particularly in determining fitness for use and in eliminating bias and unfairness. While counts o…

cs.DB20201 cited

Towards Inferring Queries from Simple and Partial Provenance Examples

Amir Gilad, Yuval Moskovitch

The field of query-by-example aims at inferring queries from output examples given by non-expert users, by finding the underlying logic that binds the examples. However, for a very…

cs.DB2020

Equivalence-Invariant Algebraic Provenance for Hyperplane Update Queries

Pierre Bourhis, Daniel Deutch, Yuval Moskovitch

The algebraic approach for provenance tracking, originating in the semiring model of Green et. al, has proven useful as an abstract way of handling metadata. Commutative Semirings…

cs.DB2020

Hypothetical Reasoning via Provenance Abstraction

Daniel Deutch, Yuval Moskovitch, Noam Rinetzky

Data analytics often involves hypothetical reasoning: repeatedly modifying the data and observing the induced effect on the computation result of a data-centric application. Previo…