170 citations · 516 across the 41 of their papers we have counts for
8 papers · 1 filter
Assessing the Sufficiency of Arguments through Conclusion Generation
Timon Gurcke, Milad Alshomary, Henning Wachsmuth
The premises of an argument give evidence or other reasons to support a conclusion. However, the amount of support required depends on the generality of a conclusion, the nature of…
Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization
Milad Alshomary, Timon Gurcke, Shahbaz Syed +5
Key point analysis is the task of extracting a set of concise and high-level statements from a given collection of arguments, representing the gist of these arguments. This paper p…
Controlled Neural Sentence-Level Reframing of News Articles
Wei-Fan Chen, Khalid Al-Khatib, Benno Stein +1
Framing a news article means to portray the reported event from a specific perspective, e.g., from an economic or a health perspective. Reframing means to change this perspective.…
Scientia Potentia Est -- On the Role of Knowledge in Computational Argumentation
Anne Lauscher, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych +1
Despite extensive research efforts in recent years, computational argumentation (CA) remains one of the most challenging areas of natural language processing. The reason for this i…
Generating Informative Conclusions for Argumentative Texts
Shahbaz Syed, Khalid Al-Khatib, Milad Alshomary +2
The purpose of an argumentative text is to support a certain conclusion. Yet, they are often omitted, expecting readers to infer them rather. While appropriate when reading an indi…
Argument Undermining: Counter-Argument Generation by Attacking Weak Premises
Milad Alshomary, Shahbaz Syed, Arkajit Dhar +2
Text generation has received a lot of attention in computational argumentation research as of recent. A particularly challenging task is the generation of counter-arguments. So far…
Belief-based Generation of Argumentative Claims
Milad Alshomary, Wei-Fan Chen, Timon Gurcke +1
When engaging in argumentative discourse, skilled human debaters tailor claims to the beliefs of the audience, to construct effective arguments. Recently, the field of computationa…
Learning From Revisions: Quality Assessment of Claims in Argumentation at Scale
Gabriella Skitalinskaya, Jonas Klaff, Henning Wachsmuth
Assessing the quality of arguments and of the claims the arguments are composed of has become a key task in computational argumentation. However, even if different claims share the…