170 citations · 254 across the 34 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers · 2 filters
To Revise or Not to Revise: Learning to Detect Improvable Claims for Argumentative Writing Support
Gabriella Skitalinskaya, Henning Wachsmuth
Optimizing the phrasing of argumentative text is crucial in higher education and professional development. However, assessing whether and how the different claims in a text should…
Modeling Appropriate Language in Argumentation
Timon Ziegenbein, Shahbaz Syed, Felix Lange +2
Online discussion moderators must make ad-hoc decisions about whether the contributions of discussion participants are appropriate or should be removed to maintain civility. Existi…
The Touché23-ValueEval Dataset for Identifying Human Values behind Arguments
Nailia Mirzakhmedova, Johannes Kiesel, Milad Alshomary +11
We present the Touché23-ValueEval Dataset for Identifying Human Values behind Arguments. To investigate approaches for the automated detection of human values behind arguments, we…
Conclusion-based Counter-Argument Generation
Milad Alshomary, Henning Wachsmuth
In real-world debates, the most common way to counter an argument is to reason against its main point, that is, its conclusion. Existing work on the automatic generation of natural…