activity
20202026
most citedOrchestra: Unsupervised Federated Learning via Globally Consistent Clustering

20 citations · 95 across the 49 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

16 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2025

From Isolation to Entanglement: When Do Interpretability Methods Identify and Disentangle Known Concepts?

Aaron Mueller, Andrew Lee, Shruti Joshi +3

A goal of interpretability is to recover disentangled representations of latent concepts (features) from the activations of neural networks. The quality of features is typically ev…

cs.LG2025

Priors in Time: Missing Inductive Biases for Language Model Interpretability

Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Can Rager, Sai Sumedh R. Hindupur +13

Recovering meaningful concepts from language model activations is a central aim of interpretability. While existing feature extraction methods aim to identify concepts that are ind…

cs.CL2025

Are language models aware of the road not taken? Token-level uncertainty and hidden state dynamics

Amir Zur, Atticus Geiger, Ekdeep Singh Lubana +1

When a language model generates text, the selection of individual tokens might lead it down very different reasoning paths, making uncertainty difficult to quantify. In this work,…

cs.AI2025

The Impact of Off-Policy Training Data on Probe Generalisation

Nathalie Kirch, Samuel Dower, Adrians Skapars +3

Probing has emerged as a promising method for monitoring large language models (LLMs), enabling cheap inference-time detection of concerning behaviours. However, natural examples o…

cs.LG2025

Belief Dynamics Reveal the Dual Nature of In-Context Learning and Activation Steering

Eric Bigelow, Daniel Wurgaft, YingQiao Wang +4

Large language models (LLMs) can be controlled at inference time through prompts (in-context learning) and internal activations (activation steering). Different accounts have been…

cs.CV2025★ 4 cited

Into the Rabbit Hull: From Task-Relevant Concepts in DINO to Minkowski Geometry

Thomas Fel, Binxu Wang, Michael A. Lepori +8

DINOv2 is routinely deployed to recognize objects, scenes, and actions; yet the nature of what it perceives remains unknown. As a working baseline, we adopt the Linear Representati…

cs.CL2025

How Do LLMs Persuade? Linear Probes Can Uncover Persuasion Dynamics in Multi-Turn Conversations

Brandon Jaipersaud, David Krueger, Ekdeep Singh Lubana

Large Language Models (LLMs) have started to demonstrate the ability to persuade humans, yet our understanding of how this dynamic transpires is limited. Recent work has used linea…

cs.CL2025

Emergence of Hierarchical Emotion Organization in Large Language Models

Maya Okawa, Bo Zhao, Eric J. Bigelow +4

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly power conversational agents, understanding how they model users' emotional states is critical for ethical deployment. Inspired by emoti…

cs.LG2025

In-Context Learning Strategies Emerge Rationally

Daniel Wurgaft, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Core Francisco Park +3

Recent work analyzing in-context learning (ICL) has identified a broad set of strategies that describe model behavior in different experimental conditions. We aim to unify these fi…

cs.GR2025

Uncovering Conceptual Blindspots in Generative Image Models Using Sparse Autoencoders

Matyas Bohacek, Thomas Fel, Maneesh Agrawala +1

Despite their impressive performance, generative image models trained on large-scale datasets frequently fail to produce images with seemingly simple concepts -- e.g., human hands…

cs.LG2025

Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probes

Alex McKenzie, Urja Pawar, Phil Blandfort +4

Monitoring is an important aspect of safely deploying Large Language Models (LLMs). This paper examines activation probes for detecting ``high-stakes'' interactions -- where the te…

cs.LG2025

Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders: From Shallow Design to Matching Pursuit

Valérie Costa, Thomas Fel, Ekdeep Singh Lubana +2

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have recently become central tools for interpretability, leveraging dictionary learning principles to extract sparse, interpretable features from neural…

cs.LG2025

From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuit

Valérie Costa, Thomas Fel, Ekdeep Singh Lubana +2

Motivated by the hypothesis that neural network representations encode abstract, interpretable features as linearly accessible, approximately orthogonal directions, sparse autoenco…

cs.LG2025

Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometry

Sai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel +1

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to interpret neural networks by identifying meaningful concepts from their representations. However, do SAEs truly uncover all concepts a…

cs.CV2025

Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Models

Thomas Fel, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Jacob S. Prince +7

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful framework for machine learning interpretability, enabling the unsupervised decomposition of model representations into a dicti…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

ICLR: In-Context Learning of Representations

Core Francisco Park, Andrew Lee, Ekdeep Singh Lubana +5

Recent work has demonstrated that semantics specified by pretraining data influence how representations of different concepts are organized in a large language model (LLM). However…