activity
20112022
most citedOn the Limitations of Provenance for Queries With Difference

29 citations · 63 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.DB2022★ 2 cited

Worst-case Analysis for Interactive Evaluation of Boolean Provenance

Antoine Amarilli, Yael Amsterdamer

In recent work, we have introduced a framework for fine-grained consent management in databases, which combines Boolean data provenance with the field of interactive Boolean evalua…

cs.DB2022★ 1 cited

Selecting Sub-tables for Data Exploration

Kathy Razmadze, Yael Amsterdamer, Amit Somech +2

We present a framework for creating small, informative sub-tables of large data tables to facilitate the first step of data science: data exploration. Given a large data table tabl…

cs.CL2021★ 1 cited

Multi-Document Keyphrase Extraction: Dataset, Baselines and Review

Ori Shapira, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Ido Dagan +1

Keyphrase extraction has been extensively researched within the single-document setting, with an abundance of methods, datasets and applications. In contrast, multi-document keyphr…

cs.CL2020★ 1 cited

Evaluating Interactive Summarization: an Expansion-Based Framework

Ori Shapira, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Hadar Ronen +3

Allowing users to interact with multi-document summarizers is a promising direction towards improving and customizing summary results. Different ideas for interactive summarization…

cs.CL2019★ 4 cited

Crowdsourcing Lightweight Pyramids for Manual Summary Evaluation

Ori Shapira, David Gabay, Yang Gao +5

Conducting a manual evaluation is considered an essential part of summary evaluation methodology. Traditionally, the Pyramid protocol, which exhaustively compares system summaries…

cs.DB2017★ 2 cited

Top-k Querying of Unknown Values under Order Constraints (Extended Version)

Antoine Amarilli, Yael Amsterdamer, Tova Milo +1

Many practical scenarios make it necessary to evaluate top-k queries over data items with partially unknown values. This paper considers a setting where the values are taken from a…

cs.DB2014★ 12 cited

Uncertainty in Crowd Data Sourcing under Structural Constraints

Antoine Amarilli, Yael Amsterdamer, Tova Milo

Applications extracting data from crowdsourcing platforms must deal with the uncertainty of crowd answers in two different ways: first, by deriving estimates of the correct value f…

cs.DB2013★ 3 cited

On the Complexity of Mining Itemsets from the Crowd Using Taxonomies

Antoine Amarilli, Yael Amsterdamer, Tova Milo

We study the problem of frequent itemset mining in domains where data is not recorded in a conventional database but only exists in human knowledge. We provide examples of such sce…

cs.DB2011★ 8 cited

Putting Lipstick on Pig: Enabling Database-style Workflow Provenance

Yael Amsterdamer, Susan B. Davidson, Daniel Deutch +3

Workflow provenance typically assumes that each module is a "black-box", so that each output depends on all inputs (coarse-grained dependencies). Furthermore, it does not model the…

cs.DB2011★ 29 cited

On the Limitations of Provenance for Queries With Difference

Yael Amsterdamer, Daniel Deutch, Val Tannen

The annotation of the results of database transformations was shown to be very effective for various applications. Until recently, most works in this context focused on positive qu…

cs.DB2011

Provenance for Aggregate Queries

Yael Amsterdamer, Daniel Deutch, Val Tannen

We study in this paper provenance information for queries with aggregation. Provenance information was studied in the context of various query languages that do not allow for aggre…