activity
20202026
most citedValue Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties

31 citations · 109 across the 36 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

38 papers

cs.CL2026

XYBench: Can LLMs Respond Pragmatically to Queries with Misconceptions?

Akhila Yerukola, Jena D. Hwang, Mingqian Zheng +5

When non-expert users ask LLMs for assistance, their queries can often have misconceptions (e.g., "How do I parse XML with regex?"). In such cases, often referred to as the XY-prob…

cs.CL2025★ 2 cited

Olmo 3

Team Olmo, :, Allyson Ettinger +66

We introduce Olmo 3, a family of state-of-the-art, fully-open language models at the 7B and 32B parameter scales. Olmo 3 model construction targets long-context reasoning, function…

cs.CL2025

A Good Plan is Hard to Find: Aligning Models with Preferences is Misaligned with What Helps Users

Nishant Balepur, Matthew Shu, Yoo Yeon Sung +5

To assist users in complex tasks, LLMs generate plans: step-by-step instructions towards a goal. While alignment methods aim to ensure LLM plans are helpful, they train (RLHF) or e…

cs.CL2025

Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following

Valentina Pyatkin, Saumya Malik, Victoria Graf +5

A crucial factor for successful human and AI interaction is the ability of language models or chatbots to follow human instructions precisely. A common feature of instructions are…

cs.CL2025

Is It JUST Semantics? A Case Study of Discourse Particle Understanding in LLMs

William Sheffield, Kanishka Misra, Valentina Pyatkin +3

Discourse particles are crucial elements that subtly shape the meaning of text. These words, often polyfunctional, give rise to nuanced and often quite disparate semantic/discourse…

cs.CL2025

RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation

Saumya Malik, Valentina Pyatkin, Sander Land +4

Reward models are used throughout the post-training of language models to capture nuanced signals from preference data and provide a training target for optimization across instruc…

cs.CL2025

IssueBench: Millions of Realistic Prompts for Measuring Issue Bias in LLM Writing Assistance

Paul Röttger, Musashi Hinck, Valentin Hofmann +4

Large language models (LLMs) are helping millions of users write texts about diverse issues, and in doing so expose users to different ideas and perspectives. This creates concerns…

cs.CL2025★ 2 cited

2 OLMo 2 Furious

Team OLMo, Pete Walsh, Luca Soldaini +40

We present OLMo 2, the next generation of our fully open language models. OLMo 2 includes a family of dense autoregressive language models at 7B, 13B and 32B scales with fully rele…

cs.CL2024★ 8 cited

Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training

Nathan Lambert, Jacob Morrison, Valentina Pyatkin +20

Language model post-training is applied to refine behaviors and unlock new skills across a wide range of recent language models, but open recipes for applying these techniques lag…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Hybrid Preferences: Learning to Route Instances for Human vs. AI Feedback

Lester James V. Miranda, Yizhong Wang, Yanai Elazar +6

Learning from human feedback has enabled the alignment of language models (LMs) with human preferences. However, collecting human preferences is expensive and time-consuming, with…

cs.CL2024

SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior

Jing-Jing Li, Valentina Pyatkin, Max Kleiman-Weiner +7

The ideal AI safety moderation system would be both structurally interpretable (so its decisions can be reliably explained) and steerable (to align to safety standards and reflect…

cs.CL2024

Diverging Preferences: When do Annotators Disagree and do Models Know?

Michael JQ Zhang, Zhilin Wang, Jena D. Hwang +6

We examine diverging preferences in human-labeled preference datasets. We develop a taxonomy of disagreement sources spanning ten categories across four high-level classes and find…

cs.CL2024

Explicating the Implicit: Argument Detection Beyond Sentence Boundaries

Paul Roit, Aviv Slobodkin, Eran Hirsch +4

Detecting semantic arguments of a predicate word has been conventionally modeled as a sentence-level task. The typical reader, however, perfectly interprets predicate-argument rela…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Self-Directed Synthetic Dialogues and Revisions Technical Report

Nathan Lambert, Hailey Schoelkopf, Aaron Gokaslan +3

Synthetic data has become an important tool in the fine-tuning of language models to follow instructions and solve complex problems. Nevertheless, the majority of open data to date…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models

Faeze Brahman, Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran +11

Chat-based language models are designed to be helpful, yet they should not comply with every user request. While most existing work primarily focuses on refusal of "unsafe" queries…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback

Hamish Ivison, Yizhong Wang, Jiacheng Liu +6

Learning from preference feedback has emerged as an essential step for improving the generation quality and performance of modern language models (LMs). Despite its widespread use,…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild

Bill Yuchen Lin, Yuntian Deng, Khyathi Chandu +6

We introduce WildBench, an automated evaluation framework designed to benchmark large language models (LLMs) using challenging, real-world user queries. WildBench consists of 1,024…

cs.CL2024

Superlatives in Context: Modeling the Implicit Semantics of Superlatives

Valentina Pyatkin, Bonnie Webber, Ido Dagan +1

Superlatives are used to single out elements with a maximal/minimal property. Semantically, superlatives perform a set comparison: something (or some things) has the min/max proper…

cs.LG2024★ 5 cited

RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling

Nathan Lambert, Valentina Pyatkin, Jacob Morrison +9

Reward models (RMs) are at the crux of successfully using RLHF to align pretrained models to human preferences, yet there has been relatively little study that focuses on evaluatio…

cs.CL2024★ 7 cited

Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Models

Paul Röttger, Valentin Hofmann, Valentina Pyatkin +4

Much recent work seeks to evaluate values and opinions in large language models (LLMs) using multiple-choice surveys and questionnaires. Most of this work is motivated by concerns…

cs.CL2024★ 11 cited

OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models

Dirk Groeneveld, Iz Beltagy, Pete Walsh +40

Language models (LMs) have become ubiquitous in both NLP research and in commercial product offerings. As their commercial importance has surged, the most powerful models have beco…

cs.CL2024

Promptly Predicting Structures: The Return of Inference

Maitrey Mehta, Valentina Pyatkin, Vivek Srikumar

Prompt-based methods have been used extensively across NLP to build zero- and few-shot label predictors. Many NLP tasks are naturally structured: that is, their outputs consist of…

cs.CL2023★ 8 cited

Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2

Hamish Ivison, Yizhong Wang, Valentina Pyatkin +8

Since the release of TÜLU [Wang et al., 2023b], open resources for instruction tuning have developed quickly, from better base models to new finetuning techniques. We test and inco…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

What Makes it Ok to Set a Fire? Iterative Self-distillation of Contexts and Rationales for Disambiguating Defeasible Social and Moral Situations

Kavel Rao, Liwei Jiang, Valentina Pyatkin +5

Moral or ethical judgments rely heavily on the specific contexts in which they occur. Understanding varying shades of defeasible contextualizations (i.e., additional information th…