From the 1 of 8 linked papers with an AI index.
8 papers
Female participation in science in the past 125 years: An analysis of the Matilda effect over time
Felix Bittmann, Lutz Bornmann
The paper analyzes the historical under‑recognition of women in science (the Matilda effect) by comparing the proportion of female authors to female corresponding authors across mo…
Judges matter more than papers in post-publication research assessment
Robert Ward, Alex Jones, Lutz Bornmann
Research assessment relies on expert evaluations, yet human judgement is noisy, and it is unclear whether differences in assessment arise primarily from differences in genuine rese…
The Rising Dominance of Methods Across Science
Alexander Krauss, Ariel Rosenfeld, Lutz Bornmann
Scientific progress is traditionally narrated through the interplay of theoretical insights and experimental findings. Yet this view of science underplays a third and central pilla…
Large language models for post-publication research evaluation: Evidence from expert recommendations and citation indicators
Mengjia Wu, Yi Zhang, Robin Haunschild +1
Assessing the quality of scientific research is essential for scholarly communication, yet widely used approaches face limitations in scalability, subjectivity, and time delay. Rec…
Citation accuracy, citation noise, and citation bias: A foundation of citation analysis
Lutz Bornmann, Christian Leibel
Citation analysis is widely used in research evaluation to assess the impact of scientific papers. These analyses rest on the assumption that citation decisions by authors are accu…
Introducing multiverse analysis to bibliometrics: The case of team size effects on disruptive research
Christian Leibel, Lutz Bornmann
Although bibliometrics has become an essential tool in the evaluation of research performance, bibliometric analyses are sensitive to a range of methodological choices. Subtle choi…