activity
20192022
most citedDon't Settle for Average, Go for the Max: Fuzzy Sets and Max-Pooled Word Vectors

24 citations · 56 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

8 papers

cs.CL2022

Consultation Checklists: Standardising the Human Evaluation of Medical Note Generation

Aleksandar Savkov, Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis +3

Evaluating automatically generated text is generally hard due to the inherently subjective nature of many aspects of the output quality. This difficulty is compounded in automatic…

cs.HC2022★ 2 cited

User-Driven Research of Medical Note Generation Software

Tom Knoll, Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis +7

A growing body of work uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods to automatically generate medical notes from audio recordings of doctor-patient consultations. However, there…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

Human Evaluation and Correlation with Automatic Metrics in Consultation Note Generation

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Mark Perera +5

In recent years, machine learning models have rapidly become better at generating clinical consultation notes; yet, there is little work on how to properly evaluate the generated c…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

PriMock57: A Dataset Of Primary Care Mock Consultations

Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Francesco Moramarco, Radmila Sarac +1

Recent advances in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) have made it possible to reliably produce automatic transcripts of clinician-patient conversations. However, access to clinica…

cs.CL2021★ 11 cited

Towards more patient friendly clinical notes through language models and ontologies

Francesco Moramarco, Damir Juric, Aleksandar Savkov +8

Clinical notes are an efficient way to record patient information but are notoriously hard to decipher for non-experts. Automatically simplifying medical text can empower patients…

cs.CL2021★ 6 cited

Towards objectively evaluating the quality of generated medical summaries

Francesco Moramarco, Damir Juric, Aleksandar Savkov +1

We propose a method for evaluating the quality of generated text by asking evaluators to count facts, and computing precision, recall, f-score, and accuracy from the raw counts. We…

cs.CL2021★ 9 cited

A preliminary study on evaluating Consultation Notes with Post-Editing

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Aleksandar Savkov +1

Automatic summarisation has the potential to aid physicians in streamlining clerical tasks such as note taking. But it is notoriously difficult to evaluate these systems and demons…

cs.CL2019★ 24 cited

Don't Settle for Average, Go for the Max: Fuzzy Sets and Max-Pooled Word Vectors

Vitalii Zhelezniak, Aleksandar Savkov, April Shen +3

Recent literature suggests that averaged word vectors followed by simple post-processing outperform many deep learning methods on semantic textual similarity tasks. Furthermore, wh…