3.2k citations · 9.8k across the 51 of their papers we have counts for
7 papers · 2 filters
Testing Robustness Against Unforeseen Adversaries
Max Kaufmann, Daniel Kang, Yi Sun +9
Adversarial robustness research primarily focuses on L_p perturbations, and most defenses are developed with identical training-time and test-time adversaries. However, in real-wor…
Natural Adversarial Examples
Dan Hendrycks, Kevin Zhao, Steven Basart +2
We introduce two challenging datasets that reliably cause machine learning model performance to substantially degrade. The datasets are collected with a simple adversarial filtrati…
Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertainty
Dan Hendrycks, Mantas Mazeika, Saurav Kadavath +1
Self-supervision provides effective representations for downstream tasks without requiring labels. However, existing approaches lag behind fully supervised training and are often n…
Transfer of Adversarial Robustness Between Perturbation Types
Daniel Kang, Yi Sun, Tom Brown +2
We study the transfer of adversarial robustness of deep neural networks between different perturbation types. While most work on adversarial examples has focused on and…
Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations
Dan Hendrycks, Thomas Dietterich
In this paper we establish rigorous benchmarks for image classifier robustness. Our first benchmark, ImageNet-C, standardizes and expands the corruption robustness topic, while sho…
Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposure
Dan Hendrycks, Mantas Mazeika, Thomas Dietterich
It is important to detect anomalous inputs when deploying machine learning systems. The use of larger and more complex inputs in deep learning magnifies the difficulty of distingui…
Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertainty
Dan Hendrycks, Kimin Lee, Mantas Mazeika
He et al. (2018) have called into question the utility of pre-training by showing that training from scratch can often yield similar performance to pre-training. We show that altho…