activity
20192022
most citedDon't Settle for Average, Go for the Max: Fuzzy Sets and Max-Pooled Word Vectors

24 citations · 63 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.CL2022

Consultation Checklists: Standardising the Human Evaluation of Medical Note Generation

Aleksandar Savkov, Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis +3

Evaluating automatically generated text is generally hard due to the inherently subjective nature of many aspects of the output quality. This difficulty is compounded in automatic…

cs.HC2022★ 2 cited

User-Driven Research of Medical Note Generation Software

Tom Knoll, Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis +7

A growing body of work uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods to automatically generate medical notes from audio recordings of doctor-patient consultations. However, there…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

Human Evaluation and Correlation with Automatic Metrics in Consultation Note Generation

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Mark Perera +5

In recent years, machine learning models have rapidly become better at generating clinical consultation notes; yet, there is little work on how to properly evaluate the generated c…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

PriMock57: A Dataset Of Primary Care Mock Consultations

Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Francesco Moramarco, Radmila Sarac +1

Recent advances in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) have made it possible to reliably produce automatic transcripts of clinician-patient conversations. However, access to clinica…

cs.CL2021★ 11 cited

Towards more patient friendly clinical notes through language models and ontologies

Francesco Moramarco, Damir Juric, Aleksandar Savkov +8

Clinical notes are an efficient way to record patient information but are notoriously hard to decipher for non-experts. Automatically simplifying medical text can empower patients…

cs.CL2021★ 6 cited

Towards objectively evaluating the quality of generated medical summaries

Francesco Moramarco, Damir Juric, Aleksandar Savkov +1

We propose a method for evaluating the quality of generated text by asking evaluators to count facts, and computing precision, recall, f-score, and accuracy from the raw counts. We…

cs.CL2021★ 9 cited

A preliminary study on evaluating Consultation Notes with Post-Editing

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Aleksandar Savkov +1

Automatic summarisation has the potential to aid physicians in streamlining clerical tasks such as note taking. But it is notoriously difficult to evaluate these systems and demons…

cs.CL2019

Correlations between Word Vector Sets

Vitalii Zhelezniak, April Shen, Daniel Busbridge +2

Similarity measures based purely on word embeddings are comfortably competing with much more sophisticated deep learning and expert-engineered systems on unsupervised semantic text…

cs.CL2019★ 7 cited

Correlation Coefficients and Semantic Textual Similarity

Vitalii Zhelezniak, Aleksandar Savkov, April Shen +1

A large body of research into semantic textual similarity has focused on constructing state-of-the-art embeddings using sophisticated modelling, careful choice of learning signals…

cs.CL2019★ 24 cited

Don't Settle for Average, Go for the Max: Fuzzy Sets and Max-Pooled Word Vectors

Vitalii Zhelezniak, Aleksandar Savkov, April Shen +3

Recent literature suggests that averaged word vectors followed by simple post-processing outperform many deep learning methods on semantic textual similarity tasks. Furthermore, wh…